The efficacy of screening with FDG-PET/CT for distant metastases in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant systemic therapy
- PMID: 39327358
- PMCID: PMC11785703
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07478-5
The efficacy of screening with FDG-PET/CT for distant metastases in breast cancer patients scheduled for neoadjuvant systemic therapy
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to identify which breast cancer patients benefit from the routine use of FDG-PET/CT in a large cohort of patients scheduled for neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST).
Methods: A total of 1337 breast cancer patients eligible for NST were identified from a retrospective database between 2011 and 2020 at a single tertiary care hospital. All patients underwent staging with FDG-PET/CT prior to NST. The incidence and extent of asymptomatic distant metastases in different patient subgroups were determined, as well as the impact on treatment. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify prognostic patient and tumor characteristics.
Results: FDG-PET/CT detected distant metastases in 109 patients (8%). Initial clinical stage was a prognostic factor for the presence of distant metastases, with a significantly higher risk for stage 2b and 3 as opposed to lower stages (p < 0.001). The incidence of distant metastases was 3% (4/125) for stage 1, 2% (8/534) for stage 2a, 7% (24/354) for stage 2b and 23% (73/324) for stage 3. Other characteristics such as age, tumor subtype, histological type and grade were not correlated with the risk of distant metastases. Among the subset of patients with distant metastases, 46% received palliative treatment, while the remaining 54% were diagnosed with oligometastatic breast cancer and were treated with curative intent.
Conclusion: The results of the current study support the routine use of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of distant metastases in breast cancer patients with initial clinical stage 2b and 3, regardless of tumor subtype.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Distant metastases; FDG-PET/CT; Neoadjuvant systemic therapy.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of Interest: All authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to declare.
Figures
References
-
- UICC: GLOBACAN 2022: New global cancer data. Accessed August 15, 2024. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/en
-
- Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rubio IT et al (2019) Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 30(10):1674. 10.1093/annonc/mdz189 - PubMed
-
- Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH et al (2020) Breast cancer, version 3.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 18(4):452–78. 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0016 - PubMed
-
- Koolen BB, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Aukema TS, Vogel WV, Oldenburg HS, van der Hage JA et al (2012) 18F-FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(1):117–126. 10.1007/s10549-011-1767-9 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical