Research evidence on the management of the cognitive impairment component of the post-COVID condition: a qualitative systematic review
- PMID: 39328154
- PMCID: PMC11457117
- DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1770
Research evidence on the management of the cognitive impairment component of the post-COVID condition: a qualitative systematic review
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is one of the most prevalent and burdensome consequences of COVID-19 infection, which can persist up to months or even years after remission of the infection. Current guidelines on post-COVID CI are based on available knowledge on treatments used for improving CI in other conditions. The current review aims to provide an updated overview of the existing evidence on the efficacy of treatments for post-COVID CI.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published up to December 2023 using three databases (PubMed-Scopus-ProQuest). Controlled and noncontrolled trials, cohort studies, case series, and reports testing interventions on subjects with CI following COVID-19 infection were included.
Results: After screening 7790 articles, 29 studies were included. Multidisciplinary approaches, particularly those combining cognitive remediation interventions, physical exercise, and dietary and sleep support, may improve CI and address the different needs of individuals with post-COVID-19 condition. Cognitive remediation interventions can provide a safe, cost-effective option and may be tailored to deficits in specific cognitive domains. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques and hyperbaric oxygen therapy showed mixed and preliminary results. Evidence for other interventions, including pharmacological ones, remains sparse. Challenges in interpreting existing evidence include heterogeneity in study designs, assessment tools, and recruitment criteria; lack of long-term follow-up; and under-characterization of samples in relation to confounding factors.
Conclusions: Further research, grounded on shared definitions of the post-COVID condition and on the accurate assessment of COVID-related CI, in well-defined study samples and with longer follow-ups, is crucial to address this significant unmet need.
Keywords: COVID-19; cognitive impairment; long COVID; rehabilitation; treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
Giulia Maria Giordano reports consulting fees from Angelini. Armida Mucci reports consulting fees from Pierre Fabre, Rovi, and Boehringer Ingelheim; patents with Pierre Fabre; and participation on data safety monitoring boards with Angelini and Boehringer Ingelheim. Silvana Galderisi reports consulting fees from Gedeon Richter; honoraria from Angelini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gedeon Richter, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Recordati, and Rovi; and participation on data safety monitoring boards with Angelini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and Rovi. No other competing interests were declared.
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Cognitive impairment in long-COVID.Ideggyogy Sz. 2024 May 30;77(5-6):151-159. doi: 10.18071/isz.77.0151. Ideggyogy Sz. 2024. PMID: 38829253 Review. English.
-
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32975190 Free PMC article.
-
The Efficacy of Cognitive Intervention in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): a Meta-Analysis of Outcomes on Neuropsychological Measures.Neuropsychol Rev. 2017 Dec;27(4):440-484. doi: 10.1007/s11065-017-9363-3. Epub 2017 Dec 27. Neuropsychol Rev. 2017. PMID: 29282641 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
Cited by
-
Current limitations in technology-based cognitive assessment for severe mental illnesses: a focus on feasibility, reliability, and ecological validity.Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Apr 7;19:1543005. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1543005. eCollection 2025. Front Behav Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40260202 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). WHO coronavirus (COVID-19)dashboard, https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases?n=c; 2024. [accessed 9 January 2024].
-
- Ten Have M, Tuithof M, van Dorsselaer S, Schouten F, Luik AI, de Graaf R. Prevalence and trends of common mental disorders from 2007-2009 to 2019-2022: Results from the Netherlands mental health survey and incidence studies (NEMESIS), including comparison of prevalence rates before vs. during the COVID-19 pandemic. World Psychiatry. 2023;22(2):275–85. doi:10.1002/wps.21087. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Fernandez-de-Las-Peñas C, Notarte KI, Macasaet R, Velasco JV, Catahay JA, Ver AT, et al. Persistence of post-COVID symptoms in the general population two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2024;88(2):77–88. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2023.12.004. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Galderisi S, Perrottelli A, Giuliani L, Pisaturo MA, Monteleone P, Pagliano P, et al. Cognitive impairment after recovery from COVID-19: frequency, profile, and relationships with clinical and laboratory indices. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024;79:22–31. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.11.001. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical