Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May-Jun;119(5-6):15037.
doi: 10.17159/sajs.2023/15037. Epub 2023 May 30.

Regulating scientific and technological uncertainty: The precautionary principle in the context of human genomics and AI

Affiliations

Regulating scientific and technological uncertainty: The precautionary principle in the context of human genomics and AI

Marietjie Botes. S Afr J Sci. 2023 May-Jun.

Abstract

Considered in isolation, the ethical and societal challenges posed by genomics and artificial intelligence (AI) are profound and include issues relating to autonomy, privacy, equality, bias, discrimination, and the abuse of power, amongst others. When these two technologies are combined, the ethical, legal and societal issues increase substantially, become much more complex, and can be scaled enormously, which increases the impact. Adding to these complexities, both genomics and AI-enabled technologies are rife with scientific and technological uncertainties, which makes the regulation of these technologies not only challenging in itself, but also creates legal uncertainties. In science, the precautionary principle has been used globally to govern uncertainty, with the specific aim to prevent irreversible harm to human beings. The regulation of uncertainties in AI-enabled technologies is based on risk as set out in the AI Regulation that was recently proposed by the European Commission. However, when genomics and artificial intelligence are combined, not only do uncertainties double, but the current regulation of such uncertainties towards the safe use thereof for humans seems contradictory, considering the different approaches followed by science and technology in this regard. In this article, I explore the regulation of both scientific and technological uncertainties and argue that the application of the precautionary principle in the context of human genomics and AI seems to be the most effective way to regulate the uncertainties brought about by the combination of these two technologies.

Keywords: AI; human genomics; precautionary principle; regulation; risk-based approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests I have no competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

References

    1. Wu J, Shang S. Managing uncertainty in AI-enabled decision making and achieving sustainability. Sustainability. 2020;12, Art. #8758. 10.3390/su12218758 - DOI
    1. National Human Genome Research Institute. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and genomics [webpage on the Internet]. No date [cited 2022 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/educational-resources/fact-sheets/...
    1. Farmer H. Exploring the societal implications of AI and genomics. Paper presented at: Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) 10th Plenary Meeting; 2022 September 22–23; Barcelona, Spain. c2022 [cited 2022 Oct 17]. Available from: https://assets.swoogo.com/uploads/2072198-633337284f00f.pdf
    1. Koplin JJ, Savulescu J, Vears DF. Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21, Art. #11. 10.1186/s12910-020-0449-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. US National Institutes of Health. ACMG Recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing [webpage on the Internet]. c2013 [cited 2022 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/docs/acmg/

LinkOut - more resources