A Comprehensive Review of the Endometrial Receptivity Array in Embryo Transfer: Advancements, Applications, and Clinical Outcomes
- PMID: 39328623
- PMCID: PMC11424594
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67866
A Comprehensive Review of the Endometrial Receptivity Array in Embryo Transfer: Advancements, Applications, and Clinical Outcomes
Abstract
Embryo transfer is a pivotal procedure in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Yet, the success of this process hinges on multiple factors, with endometrial receptivity playing a critical role in determining the likelihood of successful implantation. The endometrial receptivity array (ERA) is an advanced diagnostic tool designed to personalize embryo transfer timing by assessing the endometrium's receptivity. This review comprehensively examines the ERA, exploring its biological foundation, technological development, and clinical applications. The ERA's ability to analyze the expression of genes associated with endometrial receptivity offers a tailored approach to identifying the optimal window of implantation (WOI), particularly benefiting patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) or repeated unsuccessful in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Clinical outcomes from ERA-guided embryo transfers indicate improvements in implantation rates and overall pregnancy success, although challenges such as result variability and cost-effectiveness persist. This review also discusses the latest advancements in ERA technology, including integrating genomic and transcriptomic analyses, non-invasive techniques, and using artificial intelligence (AI). Controversies regarding the widespread application of ERA and its necessity in all IVF cases are critically examined. By summarizing the current state of ERA in embryo transfer, this review aims to inform clinicians, researchers, and patients about its potential to enhance ART outcomes and to highlight areas for future research and innovation.
Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies (art); embryo transfer; endometrial receptivity array (era); implantation window; personalized medicine in ivf; recurrent implantation failure (rif).
Copyright © 2024, Dahiphale et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
References
-
- Jain M, Singh M. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Assisted reproductive technology (art) techniques. - PubMed
-
- Choe J, Shanks AL. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. In vitro fertilization. - PubMed
-
- A history of developments to improve in vitro fertilization. Eskew AM, Jungheim ES. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6140213/ Mo Med. 2017;114:156–159. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Blanco-Breindel MF, Singh M, Kahn J. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Endometrial receptivity. - PubMed
-
- The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Diedrich K, Fauser BC, Devroey P, Griesinger G. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:365–377. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources