Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 12:7:100237.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100237. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-care of informal caregivers inventory

Affiliations

Development and psychometric evaluation of the self-care of informal caregivers inventory

Negin Dorri et al. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. .

Abstract

Background: In recent years, a growing body of literature on informal caregivers' health and well-being has emerged, highlighting the need for a tool to measure their self-care practices.

Objective: The aim of the study was to develop a theory-based instrument measuring the self-care behaviors of informal caregivers and test its psychometric properties.

Design: The initial phase of instrument development entailed a detailed, six-step process (conceptualization, theoretical adaptation, back-translation and cultural adaptation, cognitive interviewing, item enhancement, and content validity), followed by formal psychometric testing (participant engagement, validity, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability).

Setting: Study conducted at a hospital located in Tehran, Iran.

Participants: A sample of 234 informal caregivers of cancer outpatients receiving treatment in oncology wards was enrolled. Caregivers had to be 18 years or older, recognized as the primary caregiver by the patient, and willing to provide informed consent.

Methods: The Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory items comprise three dimensions: self-care maintenance (11 items), self-care monitoring (7 items), and self-care management (9 items), which achieved a content validity index rating of 100 % in a panel of experts. Data were collected from caregivers during routine clinic visits. Construct validity was verified through exploratory structural equation modelling and reliability was verified using Cronbach's α and multidimensional model-based reliability. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.

Results: All three dimensions showed good model fit indices (self-care maintenance: Comparative Fit Index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.99, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.044; self-care monitoring: Comparative Fit Index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 1.00, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.027; self-care management: Comparative Fit Index = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.99, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.048) and Cronbach's α of 0.88, 0.88, and 0.91, respectively. The overall multidimensional model-based reliability was 0.93. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient values for the three dimensions were 0.94, 0.60, and 0.51, respectively.

Conclusion: Preliminary testing provides support for use of the Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory in research. Using this theory-based instrument to assess the self-care practices of informal caregivers can assist in identifying topics to discuss and opportunities for guidance.

Tweetable abstract: The Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory: A validated tool for informal caregivers is useful for research. #Informalcaregivers #SelfCare.

Keywords: Caregiver burden; Informal caregivers; Outcome assessment; Prevention and control; Questionnaire design, Psychometrics; Self-care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest, financial or personal, that could have influenced this article's research, writing, or publication.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
The centrality of the dynamic process of self-care in health-promoting behaviors.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
Instrument development and formal psychometric evaluation stages.
Fig 3
Fig. 3
The practical implications of the self-care of informal caregivers inventory.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alshammari B., Noble H., McAneney H., Alshammari F., O'Halloran P. Factors associated with burden in caregivers of patients with end-stage kidney disease (A Systematic Review) Healthcare. 2021;9(9):1212. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9091212. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakas T., Champion V. Development and psychometric testing of the Bakas caregiving outcomes scale. Nurs. Res. 1999;48(5):250–259. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199909000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balza J.S., Cusatis R.N., McDonnell S.M., Basir M.A., Flynn K.E. Effective questionnaire design: how to use cognitive interviews to refine questionnaire items. J. Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2022:1–5. doi: 10.3233/npm-210848. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benko Meštrović S., Šklempe Kokić I., Friganović A., Krupa S., Babić D., Zelko E., Đorđević D. The Impact of Caregiving on Successful Ageing of Informal Carers: a Qualitative Study among Respiratory Patients’ Caregivers. Healthcare. 2023;11(5):715. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050715. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brito C.M.S., Figueiredo M.D.L.F., Tyrrell M.a.R. Comportamentos promotores de saúde por cuidadores informais de idosos: revisão integrativa. Acta Paul. Enferm. 2022;35 doi: 10.37689/acta-ape/2022ar03783. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources