Leveraging plant-based remediation technologies against chromite mining toxicity
- PMID: 39329376
- DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2024.2407908
Leveraging plant-based remediation technologies against chromite mining toxicity
Abstract
The release of hazardous hexavalent chromium from chromite mining seriously threatens habitats and human health by contaminating water, air, and soil. Vulnerability to hexavalent chromium can result in significant health risks, viz, respiratory issues, gastrointestinal illnesses, skin problems in humans, and a plethora of toxic effects in animals. Moreover, Cr(VI) toxicity can adversely affect plant physiology by inhibiting seed germination, nutrient uptake, cell division, and root development, ultimately impairing growth and vitality. Fortunately, innovative techniques such as phytoremediation and nanotechnology have been developed to address heavy metal contamination, offering a promising solution, mainly through the use of hyperaccumulating plants. Biochar derived from plant waste is widely used and is emerging as a sustainable strategy for remediating Cr(VI) contamination. Biochar is rich in carbon and highly influential in removing Cr(VI) from contaminated soils. This approach addresses immediate challenges while providing a sustainable pathway for environmental rehabilitation in chromium mining. Integrating innovative technologies with nature-based solutions offers a holistic approach to reducing the harmful effects of chromium mining, thus protecting both human well-being and ecosystems. This review highlights the impact of Cr(VI) on different living biotas and further emphasizes the use of plants and plant-based materials for the sustainable remediation of chromite mining regions.
Keywords: Chromite mining; environment; hexavalent chromium; plant-based remediation; toxicity.
Plain language summary
Cr(VI) pollution is a primary environmental crisis, and remediation using natural entities such as plants has been widely practiced. Most of these studies have documented the efficiency of plants in the remediation process. The current review emphasizes the different criteria for the selection of Cr(VI) hyperaccumulators. It also outlines the drawbacks of the technique and emphasizes the use of biochar derived from plant biomass as a better alternative. This review provides the latest updates in the field of remediation of Cr(VI) by employing both plants and plant-based biochar. Moreover, it highlights the possible biases and ethical deliberations that need to be taken into due consideration.
Similar articles
-
Rhizospheric soil chromium toxicity and its remediation using plant hyperaccumulators.Int J Phytoremediation. 2024;26(2):193-207. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2023.2231572. Epub 2023 Jul 7. Int J Phytoremediation. 2024. PMID: 37417937 Review.
-
Characteristics and applications of biochar for remediating Cr(VI)-contaminated soils and wastewater.Environ Geochem Health. 2020 Jun;42(6):1543-1567. doi: 10.1007/s10653-019-00445-w. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Environ Geochem Health. 2020. PMID: 31673917 Review.
-
Sources, impacts, factors affecting Cr uptake in plants, and mechanisms behind phytoremediation of Cr-contaminated soils.Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 15;899:165726. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165726. Epub 2023 Jul 24. Sci Total Environ. 2023. PMID: 37495153 Review.
-
Phytoremediation of industrial mines wastewater using water hyacinth.Int J Phytoremediation. 2017 Jan 2;19(1):87-96. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2016.1216078. Int J Phytoremediation. 2017. PMID: 27551860 Free PMC article.
-
Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and mining/metallurgical solid waste: a review.J Hazard Mater. 2013 Apr 15;250-251:272-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.048. Epub 2013 Jan 28. J Hazard Mater. 2013. PMID: 23467183 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources