Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 18;10(9):658.
doi: 10.3390/jof10090658.

Diversity and Distribution of Fungal Infections in Rwanda: High Risk and Gaps in Knowledge, Policy, and Interventions

Affiliations
Review

Diversity and Distribution of Fungal Infections in Rwanda: High Risk and Gaps in Knowledge, Policy, and Interventions

Claude Mambo Muvunyi et al. J Fungi (Basel). .

Abstract

Fungal infections (FIs) are spreading globally, raising a significant public health concern. However, its documentation remains sparse in Africa, particularly in Rwanda. This report provides a comprehensive review of FIs in Rwanda based on a systematic review of reports published between 1972 and 2022. The findings reveal a rich diversity of fungal pathogens, including Blastomyces, Candida, Cryptococcus, Histoplasma, Microsporum, Pneumocystis, Rhinosporidium, and Trichophyton caused human infections. Candida infections predominantly affect the vagina mucosa, while Histoplasma duboisi was linked to disseminated infections. Other pathogens, such as Blastomyces dermatitidis and Rhinosporidium seeberi, were associated with cerebellar and nasal mucosa infections, respectively. The widespread observation of soilborne fungi affecting bean crops highlights the pathogens' threat to agricultural productivity, food security, and socioeconomic stability, as well as potential health impacts on humans, animals, and the environment. Of particular importance is that there is no information about FIs among animals in the country. Moreover, the analysis underscores significant limitations in the detection, reporting, and healthcare services related to FIs in the country, indicating gaps in diagnostic capacity and surveillance systems. This is underscored by the predominant use of traditional diagnostic techniques, including culture, cytology, and histopathology in the absence of integrating more sensitive and specific molecular tools in investigating FIs. Developing the diagnostic capacities and national surveillance systems are urgently needed to improve the health of crops, animals, and humans, as well as food security and socioeconomic stability in Rwanda. Also, it is important to indicate severe gaps in the evidence to inform policymaking, guide strategic planning, and improve healthcare and public health services, underscoring the urgent need to build national capacity in fungal diagnosis, surveillance, and research. Raising awareness among the public, scientific community, healthcare providers, and policymakers remains crucial. Furthermore, this report reveals the threats of FIs on public health and food insecurity in Rwanda. A multisectoral one health strategy is essential in research and intervention to determine and reduce the health and safety impacts of fungal pathogens on humans, animals, and the environment.

Keywords: Africa; food insecurity; fungal infections; global health; healthcare; human; multisectoral one health; plants; public health; soil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of the WHO list of fungal priority pathogens according to their level of priority (adopted from the WHO open access report [3]).
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA flowchart illustrates the process of identification, screening, and inclusion of records that contain information about FIs in Rwanda in this review.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagram shows the limited reporting (possibly the detection) of fungal infections in Rwanda up until 2022.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Map of Rwanda shows the geographical distribution of fungal infections among humans, indicated with red stars, and beans (crop), indicated with green stars.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hawksworth D.L., Lücking R. Fungal Diversity Revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 Million Species. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017;5:10-1128. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0052-2016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown G.D., Ballou E.R., Bates S., Bignell E.M., Borman A.M., Brand A.C., Brown A.J., Coelho C., Cook P.C., Farrer R.A. The Pathobiology of Human Fungal Infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2024:1–18. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01062-w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The World Health Organization (WHO) WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List to Guide Research, Development and Public Health Action. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2022.
    1. Fisher M.C., Denning D.W. The WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List as a Game-Changer. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023;21:211–212. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00861-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casalini G., Giacomelli A., Antinori S. The WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List: A Crucial Reappraisal to Review the Prioritisation. Lancet Microbe. 2024;5:717–724. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00042-9. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources