People Who Self-Reported Testing HIV-Positive but Tested HIV-Negative: A Multi-Country Puzzle of Data, Serology, and Ethics, 2015-2021
- PMID: 39330909
- PMCID: PMC11435972
- DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed9090220
People Who Self-Reported Testing HIV-Positive but Tested HIV-Negative: A Multi-Country Puzzle of Data, Serology, and Ethics, 2015-2021
Abstract
During population-based HIV impact assessments (PHIAs), some participants who self-reported testing HIV-positive (PSRP) tested negative in one or more subsequent survey HIV tests. These unexpected discrepancies between their self-reported results and the survey results draw into question the validity of either the self-reported status or the test results. We analyzed PSRP with negative test results aged 15-59 years old using data collected from 2015 to 2021 in 13 countries, assessing prevalence, self-report status, survey HIV status, viral load, rapid tests and confirmatory tests, and answers to follow-up questions (such as years on treatment). Across these surveys, 19,026 participants were PSRP, and 256 (1.3%) of these were concluded to be HIV-negative after additional survey-based testing and review. PSRP determined to be HIV-negative trended higher in countries with a higher HIV prevalence, but their number was small enough that accepting self-reported HIV-positive status without testing would not have significantly affected the prevalence estimates for HIV or viral load suppression. Additionally, using more detailed information for Uganda, we examined 107 PSRP with any negative test results and found no significant correlation with years on treatment or age. Using these details, we examined support for the possible reasons for these discrepancies beyond misdiagnosis and false reporting. These findings suggest that those conducting surveys would benefit from a nuanced understanding of HIV testing among PSRP to conduct surveys ethically and produce high-quality results.
Keywords: HIV; HIV rapid tests; PHIA; Uganda; algorithms; diagnostic markers; misdiagnosis; population-based surveys; self-report status.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Fishel J.D., Barrère B., Kishor S. Validity of Data on Self-Reported HIV Status in Malawi and Uganda and Implications for Measurement of ARV Coverage. ICF International; Rockville, MD, USA: 2014.
-
- Rohr J.K., Gómez-Olivé F.X., Rosenberg M., Manne-Goehler J., Geldsetzer P., Wagner R.G., Houle B., Salomon J.A., Kahn K., Tollman S., et al. Performance of Self-Reported HIV Status in Determining True HIV Status among Older Adults in Rural South Africa: A Validation Study. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2017;20:21691. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21691. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Leslie H.H., Kabudula C.W., West R.L., Dufour M.-S.K., Julien A., Masilela N.G., Tollman S.M., Pettifor A., Kahn K., Lippman S.A. Estimating the Prevalence of Over- and Under-Reporting in HIV Testing, Status and Treatment in Rural Northeast South Africa: A Comparison of a Survey and Clinic Records. AIDS Behav. 2023:3248–3257. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04045-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Fuente-Soro L., Lopez-Varela E., Augusto O., Sacoor C., Nhacolo A., Honwana N., Karajeanes E., Vaz P., Naniche D. Monitoring Progress towards the First UNAIDS Target: Understanding the Impact of People Living with HIV Who Re-Test during HIV-Testing Campaigns in Rural Mozambique. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2018;21:e25095. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25095. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
