Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 27;42(1):543.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05242-4.

Partial prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer

Affiliations

Partial prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer

Yue Wu et al. World J Urol. .

Abstract

Background and objective: Localized prostate cancer treatment aims to balance cancer control with preserving urinary and erectile function. While focal ablative therapies have emerged, their uncertain prognosis prompts exploration of partial prostatectomy. We systematically reviewed its efficacy as a primary treatment, particularly in low-to-intermediate-risk patients.

Methods: Our review comprehensively analyzed existing studies on partial prostatectomy for localized cancer. We focused on patient selection, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes, emphasizing tumor control, continence, and erectile function. Studies involving multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies for candidate selection were included.

Key findings and limitations: Partial prostatectomy, encompassing various techniques, demonstrates promising short-term outcomes in tumor control and functional preservation. Preoperative imaging and biopsy aid in candidate selection. However, longer-term data on cancer recurrence are limited, warranting further investigation. Heterogeneity among studies and the lack of standardized follow-up protocols are notable limitations.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Partial prostatectomy offers a minimally invasive and effective treatment option for localized prostate cancer, particularly in selected patients. Preoperative imaging and biopsy play crucial roles in patient selection, while standardized follow-up protocols are needed to assess long-term outcomes. Future research should focus on elucidating its precise role and optimizing patient selection criteria, contributing to improved prostate cancer management strategies.

Advancing practice: Partial prostatectomy is explored for localized prostate cancer treatment, aiming to balance cancer control with preserving function. Short-term outcomes are promising, but long-term data on recurrence are lacking. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection and standardize follow-up protocols.

Keywords: Erectile dysfunction; Partial prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Systematic review; Urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung HA-O et al Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. (1542–4863 (Electronic))
    1. Williams IS et al Modern paradigms for prostate cancer detection and management. (1326–5377 (Electronic))
    1. Fletcher SA et al Contemporary national trends in prostate cancer risk profile at diagnosis. (1476–5608 (Electronic))
    1. Bill-Axelson A et al Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer – 29-Year Follow-up. (1533–4406 (Electronic))
    1. Capogrosso P et al Are We Improving Erectile Function Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy? Analysis of Patients Treated over the Last Decade. (1873–7560 (Electronic))

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources