Comparison of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm derived from microTESE
- PMID: 39331312
- PMCID: PMC11535137
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03265-9
Comparison of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm derived from microTESE
Erratum in
-
Correction: Comparison of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm derived from microTESE.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Feb;42(2):689. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03384-3. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025. PMID: 39786531 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of embryo transfer cycles using fresh vs. frozen-thawed testicular sperm derived from microTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients.
Design: The retrospective cohort study included a total of 48 couples diagnosed with NOA who underwent 93 ET cycles, both fresh and frozen-thawed embryos, and resulted in pregnancy. ET cycles were divided into two groups according to sperm type, fresh (46 cycles, 49.5%) or frozen (47 cycles, 50.5%) testicular sperm. The primary outcome was the birth weight of newborns correlated with gestational week (birth weight percentile).
Results: A comparison of patients' basic characteristics and ET cycle parameters showed no significant clinical differences between the groups. A total of 172 embryos were transferred, 86 (50%) in each group. A higher rate of good-quality blastocysts was found in the fresh testicular group (83.3% vs. 50%, p = 0.046). A comparison of pregnancy outcomes showed no significant differences in clinical pregnancy, implantation, or live birth rates. A total of 53 cycles resulted in live birth, 26 (49%) and 27 (51%) in the fresh and frozen groups, respectively. No difference was found in pregnancy length, delivery mode, or obstetrical complications. A total of 61 newborns were included, 31 (51%) and 30 (49%) in fresh and frozen testicular groups, respectively. No significant differences were found in mean birth weight or birth weight percentile between the groups.
Conclusion: No significant differences were found in obstetrical outcomes when comparing ET cycles using fresh or frozen-thawed testicular sperm retrieved from microTESE. Moreover, there is no association between the sperm source and the birth weight of newborns.
Keywords: Fresh testicular sperm; Frozen-thawed testicular sperm; Microtesticular sperm extraction (microTESE/mTESE); Neonatal outcomes; Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA); Obstetrical outcomes.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
We confirm that all authors have met the conditions of authorship, have approved the manuscript, and agree with its submission to the Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. Moreover, none of the co-authors has any conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Pregnancy outcomes in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing micro-TESE: comparison of fresh vs. frozen-thawed testicular sperm.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Dec;41(12):3399-3404. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03291-7. Epub 2024 Oct 21. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024. PMID: 39432191
-
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30;(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5:CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub6. PMID: 27357126 Updated.
-
Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD003414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003414.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 3;6:CD003414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003414.pub4. PMID: 28675921 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35588094 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of previous cesarean delivery on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in subsequent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and single frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a historical cohort study with a large sample size.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Mar;42(3):817-826. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03368-3. Epub 2024 Dec 28. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025. PMID: 39730947
Cited by
-
Fresh versus frozen micro-TESE sperm and outcomes.Asian J Androl. 2025 May 1;27(3):399-408. doi: 10.4103/aja202513. Epub 2025 Apr 18. Asian J Androl. 2025. PMID: 40247725 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Willott GM. Frequency of azoospermia. Forensic Sci Int. 1982;20(1):9–10. - PubMed
-
- Jarow JP, Espeland MA, Lipshultz LI. Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol. 1989;142(1):62–5. - PubMed
-
- Corona G, Minhas S, Giwercman A, Bettocchi C, Dinkelman-Smit M, Dohle G, et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(6):733–57. - PubMed
-
- Esteves SC, Ramasamy R, Colpi GM, Carvalho JF, Schlegel PN. Sperm retrieval rates by micro-TESE versus conventional TESE in men with non-obstructive azoospermia-the assumption of independence in effect sizes might lead to misleading conclusions. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(4):603–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources