Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jun;169(6):1772-1781.e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.028. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

The impact of blood type and body size on successful bridging to heart transplantation using intra-aortic balloon pump or surgically implanted microaxial left ventricular assist device

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The impact of blood type and body size on successful bridging to heart transplantation using intra-aortic balloon pump or surgically implanted microaxial left ventricular assist device

Taylor Nordan et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Waitlist time for United Network for Organ Sharing Status 2 heart transplant candidates has steadily increased. We compared a bridging strategy using either the Impella 5.0/5.5 ("Impella") or intra-aortic balloon pump with a durable left ventricular assist device in patients with blood type O stratified by body habitus.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried for adults listed for de novo heart transplantation (without dialysis) supported by the Impella, an intra-aortic balloon pump, or the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device. The primary outcome was 1-year postlisting survival, defined as the sum of waitlist time and post-heart transplant survival time if the candidate underwent heart transplantation.

Results: In total, 2942 candidates were included (Impella: 214; intra-aortic balloon pump: 1326; HeartMate 3: 1402). Listing with the Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump was associated with worse postlisting survival compared with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device in type O candidates (Impella: hazard ratio, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.48-5.67], P = .002; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.59-3.68], P < .001) but less so in non-type O candidates. Further analysis of type O candidates demonstrated that the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump were associated with a lower risk of postlisting mortality among those with normal height (25-75th percentile) and nonobese (body mass index <30) (Impella: hazard ratio, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.61-5.18], P = .292; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 0.67-2.45], P = .455); among those not of normal height and nonobese, the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump were associated with an elevated risk of postlisting mortality (Impella: hazard ratio, 3.65 [95% CI, 1.68-7.95], P = .001; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 3.01 [95% CI, 1.95-4.67], P < .001).

Conclusions: Blood type O candidates listed with the Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump are at increased risk of postlisting mortality compared with a durable left ventricular assist device in the current organ allocation era. These effects are diminished among those with normal height and body habitus.

Keywords: blood type; heart transplantation; mechanical circulatory support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement Dr Mehra reports payments made to his institution from Abbott for consulting; consulting fees from Mesoblast, Janssen, Moderna, Paragonix, Natera and Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Second Heart Assist, and Cadrenal; Advisory board member for Transmedics, NuPulseCV, Leviticus, and FineHeart. Dr Itoh receives speaker honoraria from Abbott and Abiomed. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

Publication types

MeSH terms