Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Dec;47(12):3467-3472.
doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01854-w. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

36-month durability of ultrasound renal denervation for hypertension resistant to combination therapy in RADIANCE-HTN TRIO

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

36-month durability of ultrasound renal denervation for hypertension resistant to combination therapy in RADIANCE-HTN TRIO

Michael J Bloch et al. Hypertens Res. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) reduced blood pressure (BP) compared to sham at 2 months in patients with resistant hypertension in the multicenter, blinded, randomized, sham-controlled RADIANCE-HTN TRIO trial. This analysis evaluates longer-term outcomes of patients randomized to uRDN. Patients with resistant hypertension to a 3-drug combination pill were randomized to uRDN (n = 69) or sham (n = 67). From 2-5 months, patients followed a standardized anti-hypertensive medication (AHM) titration protocol. At 6 months, patients were unblinded and received AHM per standard of care. In the uRDN group, 71% (49/69) completed 36-month follow-up. Screening office BP was 159/103 on 3.9 AHM. Baseline office BP on the single-pill combination was 153/99 mmHg. At 36 months, office BP changed by -14.5 ± 26.1/-9.0 ± 14.8 mmHg from screening (p < 0.001 for both) and -8.0 ± 24.5/-5.0 ± 14.6 mmHg from baseline (p = 0.007; p = 0.022) on 3.7 AHM. The efficacy of uRDN was durable to 36 months in patients with resistant hypertension with no safety concerns.

Keywords: Hypertension; blood pressure; renal denervation; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Conflict of interest: MJB has received personal fees from Recor Medical and Medtronic. AJK reports institutional funding to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Amgen, CSI, Philips, Recor Medical, Neurotronic, Biotronik, Chiesi, Bolt Medical, Magenta Medical, Canon, SoniVie, and Merck. In addition to research grants, institutional funding includes fees paid to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation for consulting and/or speaking engagements in which AJK controlled the content. Personal: Consulting from IMDS; Travel Expenses/Meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, CSI, Siemens, Philips, Recor Medical, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, and Regeneron. MA has received research grants from the European Horizon 2020 programme; has received grant support and non-financial support from Recor Medical, Novartis, and Idorsia; and has received personal fees from Alnylam Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Medtronic, Astra Zeneca. FM is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (DGK), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR219, Project-ID 322900939), and Deutsche Herzstiftung. He has received scientific support from Ablative Solutions, Medtronic and Recor Medical and speaker honoraria/consulting fees from Ablative Solutions, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Inari, Medtronic, Merck, Recor Medical, Servier, and Terumo. JB has reported receiving grants from Recor Medical and Ablative Solutions. JD has received institutional grant/research support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, ACIST Medical, Medtronic, Microport, Pie Medical, and Recor Medical, and consultancy and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, ACIST medical, Boston Scientific, Cardialysis BV, CardiacBooster, Kaminari Medical, Recor Medical, PulseCath, Pie Medical, Sanofi, Siemens Health Care and Medtronic. MS has received grant support from Recor Medical, Ablative Solutions, Applied Therapeutics, Vascular Dynamics, and MSD; and has received consulting fees from Recor Medical, Esperion Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Novartis, and Vifor Pharma. LT is an employee of NAMSA, a contractor for Recor Medical. MM and LC are employees of Recor Medical. RES has received research grants and personal fees from Recor Medical, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Change in Office Blood Pressure from screening (prior to standardization on triple pill) (Left) and change from baseline (after standardization on triple pill) (Right)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Individual Changes From Baseline to 36 Months in Office Systolic Blood Pressure - TRIO 36M Follow-up

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kirtane AJ, Sharp ASP, Mahfoud F, Fisher NDL, Schmieder RE, Daemen J, et al. Patient-level pooled analysis of ultrasound renal denervation in the sham-controlled RADIANCE II, RADIANCE-HTN SOLO, and RADIANCE-HTN TRIO Trials. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8:464–73. 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.0338. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azizi M, Sharp ASP, Fisher NDL, Weber MA, Lobo MD, Daemen J, et al. Patient-level pooled analysis of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure at 6 months following medication escalation: The RADIANCE Clinical Trial Program. Circulation. 2024;149:747–59. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066941. - PubMed
    1. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:957–67. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8. - PubMed
    1. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists C. Blood pressure-lowering treatment based on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2014;384:591–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61212-5. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources