Evaluating 4Kscore's role in predicting progression on active surveillance for prostate cancer independently of clinical information and PIRADS score
- PMID: 39333697
- DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00898-w
Evaluating 4Kscore's role in predicting progression on active surveillance for prostate cancer independently of clinical information and PIRADS score
Abstract
Background: 4Kscore is used to aid the decision for prostate biopsy, however its role in active surveillance (AS) has not been investigated in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based protocol. Our objective was to assess the association between 4Kscore and progression in men undergoing AS on a prospective MRI-based protocol.
Methods: This was a single-institution, single-arm, non-therapeutic, interventional trial of 166 men with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer enrolled between 2014-2020. Patients were placed on a trial-mandated AS protocol including yearly multiparametric (mp)MRI, prostate biopsy, and 4Kscore followed for 48 months after diagnosis. We analyzed protocol-defined and grade progression at confirmatory and subsequent surveillance biopsies.
Results: Out of 166 patients, 83 (50%) men progressed per protocol and of them 41 (24.7% of whole cohort) progressed by grade. At confirmatory biopsy, men with a baseline 4Kscore ≥ 20% had a higher risk of grade progression compared to those with 4Kscore < 20% (OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 1.05-15.59, p = 0.043) after adjusting for National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk and baseline PIRADS score. At surveillance biopsies, most recent 4Kscore ≥ 20% significantly predicted per protocol (OR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.03-6.63, p = 0.044) and grade progression (OR = 5.13, 95% CI: 1.63-16.11, p = 0.005).
Conclusions: For patients on AS, baseline 4Kscore predicted grade progression at confirmatory biopsy, and most recent 4Kscore predicted per-protocol and grade progression at surveillance biopsy.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The University of Miami Institutional Review Board approved the study (#20140372). All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
References
-
- O’Connor LP, Wang AZ, Yerram NK, Long L, Ahdoot M, Lebastchi AH, et al. Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the Prostate Cancer Radiologic Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria to Detect Prostate Cancer Progression for Men on Active Surveillance. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4:227–34. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials