Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1130.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11633-5.

Acceptance and use of mobile health technology in post-abortion care

Zahra Zolfaqari  1 , Haleh Ayatollahi  2 , Fahimeh Ranjbar  3 , Arezoo Abasi  4
Affiliations

Acceptance and use of mobile health technology in post-abortion care

Zahra Zolfaqari et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Abortion and its complications have always been associated with challenges such as the lack of awareness, high cost of receiving in-person services, lack of access to the skilled healthcare workers, distance from healthcare centers in remote areas, and cultural sensitivities. Therefore, the use of mobile health technology in post-abortion care has been suggested. This study aimed to investigate factors influencing the acceptance and use of mhealth technology in post-abortion care.

Method: A mixed-methods study was completed in 2023. Initially, a literature review was conducted. Then, a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire was designed based on the results of the literature review. The research participants were gynecologists (n = 24), midwives (n = 38), and women who had experience of abortion (n = 183). Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: The findings revealed that the participants had different opinions about the importance of motivating and inhibiting factors which included individual, technical, economic, organizational, and ethico-legal aspects. It seems that the individual, organizational, economic, and ethico-legal motivating factors as well as the ethico-legal inhibiting factors were more important than other factors and had higher mean values. In addition, there was a statistically significant difference between the mean values of gynecologists and patients regarding the individual motivating (P = 0.014) and technical inhibiting factors (P = 0.016). The gynecologists' opinions regarding the technical motivating factors were also significantly different from midwives (P = 0.044) and patients (P = 0.010).

Conclusion: Multiple factors may influence the acceptance and use of mhealth technology in post-abortion care. Therefore, mhealth service developers must consider these factors to improve the quality of services and increase technology adoption. This will lead to saving costs, improving health, reducing abortion complications, and ultimately improving quality of life for women. However, further research in patient engagement and health interventions tailored to diverse cultural contexts are recommended.

Keywords: Mobile health; Post-abortion care; Technology acceptance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Niţă AM, Ilie Goga C. A research on abortion: ethics, legislation and socio-medical outcomes. Case study: Romania. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2020;61(1):283–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quenby S, Gallos ID, Dhillon-Smith RK, Podesek M, Stephenson MD, Fisher J, Brosens JJ, Brewin J, Ramhorst R, Lucas ES. Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. Lancet. 2021;397(10285):1658–67. - PubMed
    1. ADEWUMI OA. Post Abortion Care and Prevention of Maternal Mortality. 2019.
    1. Shukla A, Vazquez-Quesada L, Vieitez I, Acharya R, RamaRao. Quality of care in abortion in the era of technological and medical advancements and self-care. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sorhaindo AM, Lavelanet AF. Why does abortion stigma matter? A scoping review and hybrid analysis of qualitative evidence illustrating the role of stigma in the quality of abortion care. Soc Sci Med. 2022;311:115271. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources