Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):629.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08487-x.

The OBS UK Dashboard: an interactive tool for representative trial site selection to facilitate equality and diversity in maternity research

Amy Elsmore  1   2 , Tanvi Rai  3 , Philip Pallmann  4 , Julia Townson  4 , Sarah Kotecha  4 , Mairead Black  5 , Julia Sanders  6 , Rachel Collis  7 , Peter Collins  4   7 , Bala Karunakaran  8 , Pensee Wu  9 , Sarah Bell #  7 , William Parry-Smith #  8   9
Affiliations

The OBS UK Dashboard: an interactive tool for representative trial site selection to facilitate equality and diversity in maternity research

Amy Elsmore et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Obstetric Bleeding Study UK (OBS UK) (award ID: 152057) is a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)-funded stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention for postpartum haemorrhage. This was developed in Wales and evaluated in a feasibility study, with improvements in maternal outcomes observed. Generalisability of the findings is limited by lack of control data and limited ethnic diversity in the Welsh obstetric patient population compared to the United Kingdom (UK): 94% of the Welsh population identifies as White, versus 82% in the UK. Non-White ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation are linked to increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes. Traditionally, decisions regarding site selection are based on desire to complete trials on target in 'tried and tested' research active institutions. To ensure widespread applicability of the results and investigate the impact of ethnicity and social deprivation on trial outcomes, maternity units were recruited that represent the ethnic diversity and social deprivation profiles of the UK.

Method: Using routinely collected, publicly available data, an interactive dashboard was developed that demonstrates the demographics of the population served by each maternity unit in the UK, to inform site recruitment. Data on births per year, ethnic and socioeconomic group of the population for each maternity unit, across the UK, were integrated into the dashboard.

Results: The dashboard demonstrates that OBS UK trial sites reflect the ethnic and socioeconomic diversity of the UK (study vs UK population ethnicity: White 79.2% vs 81.7%, Asian 10.5% vs 9.3%, Black 4.7% vs 4.0%, Mixed 2.5% vs 2.9%, Other 3.0% vs 2.1%) with variation in site demography, size and location. Missing data varied across sites and nations and is presented.

Conclusion: The NIHR equality, diversity and inclusion strategy states studies must widen participation, facilitating individuals from all backgrounds to engage. The development of this novel interactive dashboard demonstrates an innovative way of achieving this. National Health Service (NHS) maternity researchers should consider using this tool to enhance diversity in research, address health disparities and improve generalisability of findings. This approach could be applied to healthcare settings beyond maternity care and across different global populations.

Trial registration: ISRCTN 17679951. Registered on August 30, 2023.

Keywords: Equality and diversity in research; Health inequalities; Index of Multiple Deprivation; Maternity care; Trial site selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The OBS UK site selection dashboard
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The OBS UK site selection dashboard—showing the 36 sites that have been enrolled onto the OBS UK trial
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kennedy-Martin T, Curtis S, Faries D, et al. A literature review on the representativeness of randomized controlled trial samples and implications for the external validity of trial results. Trials. 2015;16:495. 10.1186/s13063-015-1023-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute of Health Research. Maps of recruitment into NIHR supported research compared to prevalence from the Research Targeting Tool dashboard; 2020, https://odp.nihr.ac.uk/. Accessed 12 Sept 2023.
    1. Bower P, Grigoroglou C, Anselmi L, et al. Is health research undertaken where the burden of disease is greatest? Observational study of geographical inequalities in recruitment to research in England 2013–2018. BMC Med. 2020;18:133. 10.1186/s12916-020-01555-4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rai T, Dixon S, Ziebland S. Shifting research culture to address the mismatch between where trials recruit and where populations with the most disease live: a qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodicoat DH, Routen AC, Willis A, Ekezie W, Gillies C, Lawson C, Yates T, Zaccardi F, Davies MJ, Khunti K. Promoting inclusion in clinical trials-a rapid review of the literature and recommendations for action. Trials. 2021;22(1):880. 10.1186/s13063-021-05849-7. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources