Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 26;13(9):810.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13090810.

Murepavadin Enhances the Killing Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Inhibiting Drug Efflux

Affiliations

Murepavadin Enhances the Killing Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Inhibiting Drug Efflux

Xiaoya Wei et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogen and one of the leading causes of ventilator-associated pneumonia and infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cystic fibrosis. Murepavadin is a peptidomimetic that specifically targets outer-membrane lipopolysaccharide transport protein LptD of P. aeruginosa. In this study, we find that murepavadin enhances the bactericidal efficacy of ciprofloxacin. We further demonstrate that murepavadin increases intracellular accumulation of ciprofloxacin by suppressing drug efflux. In addition, the murepavadin-ciprofloxacin combination exhibits a synergistic bactericidal effect in an acute murine pneumonia model. In conclusion, our results identify an effective drug combination for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections.

Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; ciprofloxacin; murepavadin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The time–killing curves of murepavadin (0.5 μg/mL) and ciprofloxacin (0.25 μg/mL) alone and in combination against PA14. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 compared with the bacteria treated with the single antibiotic at the corresponding time points by Student’s t-test. The data are the means ± SD of three independent samples. Mur, murepavadin; Cip, ciprofloxacin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Murepavadin increases the intracellular accumulation of ciprofloxacin. (a) Wild type PA14 was treated with 10 µg/mL ciprofloxacin with or without 0.25 µg/mL murepavadin in Mueller–Hinton Broth (MHB) for 15 min, followed by measurement of fluorescence of intracellular ciprofloxacin. The relative fluorescence was normalized by the OD600. (b) PA14 cells were treated with or without murepavadin (0.03125 μg/mL) and ciprofloxacin (0.025 μg/mL), individually or in combination and grown to OD600 = 1 at 37 °C. The mRNA levels of PA0614, PA0629, and recA were determined by qRT-PCR. The data are the means ± SD of three independent samples. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test. Mur, murepavadin; Cip, ciprofloxacin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of CCCP on intracellular accumulation of ciprofloxacin and ethidium bromide. (a) Wild type PA14 was treated with 10 µg/mL ciprofloxacin with or without 0.25 µg/mL murepavadin and 40 µg/mL CCCP in MHB for 15 min, followed by measurement of the fluorescence of intracellular ciprofloxacin. (b) Wild type PA14 was incubated with or without 0.25 µg/mL murepavadin, 40 µg/mL CCCP and 2 μg/mL ethidium bromide in PBS for 30 min at 37 °C. The relative fluorescence was normalized by the OD600. ns, not significant; *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001 by Student’s t-test. Mur, murepavadin.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bactericidal effects of murepavadin in combination with ciprofloxacin against clinical strains. (al) The bacteria were treated with murepavadin (0.5 μg/mL) and ciprofloxacin (0.25 μg/mL) individually or in combination at 37 °C with shaking. At the indicated time points, the live bacteria numbers were determined by plating. The strain numbers were shown in each of the figures. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 compared with the bacteria treated with the single antibiotic at the corresponding time points by Student’s t-test. The data are the means ± SD of three independent samples. Mur, murepavadin; Cip, ciprofloxacin.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The murepavadin–ciprofloxacin combination displayed synergistic effect in vivo. Mice were inoculated intranasally with 4 × 106 CFU of wild type PA14. Three hours later, NaCl, murepavadin, ciprofloxacin, or the murepavadin–ciprofloxacin combination were administered intranasally. Sixteen hours post-infection, the bacterial loads in the lungs were determined. ***, p < 0.001 by Student’s t-test. Mur, murepavadin; Cip, ciprofloxacin.

Similar articles

References

    1. Martin-Loeches I., Dale G.E., Torres A. Murepavadin: A new antibiotic class in the pipeline. Expert. Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2018;16:259–268. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2018.1441024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng M., Lupoli T.J. Counteracting antibiotic resistance enzymes and efflux pumps. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2023;75:102334. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102334. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shang Z., Chan S.Y., Song Q., Li P., Huang W. The Strategies of Pathogen-Oriented Therapy on Circumventing Antimicrobial Resistance. Research. 2020;2020:2016201. doi: 10.34133/2020/2016201. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhu M., Tse M.W., Weller J., Chen J., Blainey P.C. The future of antibiotics begins with discovering new combinations. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2021;1496:82–96. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14649. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silby M.W., Winstanley C., Godfrey S.A., Levy S.B., Jackson R.W. Pseudomonas genomes: Diverse and adaptable. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011;35:652–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00269.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources