Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 17;14(9):989.
doi: 10.3390/jpm14090989.

Development and Validation of an Evaluation Questionnaire for the Healthy Early Life Moments in Singapore (HELMS) Program

Affiliations

Development and Validation of an Evaluation Questionnaire for the Healthy Early Life Moments in Singapore (HELMS) Program

Chee Wai Ku et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background/objectives: Global fertility rates are declining due to metabolic and mental health challenges in women trying to conceive. The Healthy Early Life Moments in Singapore (HELMS) program aims to address these challenges through mobile health (mHealth)-enabled lifestyle interventions. However, the lack of validated evaluation tools for such programs makes it difficult to assess their feasibility and acceptability. To tackle this, a comprehensive evaluation questionnaire was developed and validated to determine if the HELMS preconception program's implementation outcomes were achieved.

Methods: The questionnaire development process included a literature review and a two-step validation process: content validation by five content experts and face validation by 20 HELMS participants. Content validation was assessed using the scale content validity index (S-CVI) based on relevance, clarity, simplicity, and ambiguity. Face validation with participants evaluated these criteria and the ease of completing the questionnaire. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha among 49 participants.

Results: The questionnaire achieved good S-CVI values for relevance (0.93), clarity (0.91), simplicity (0.94), and ambiguity (0.71). After expert feedback, the revised version scored highly among HELMS participants for relevance (100%), clarity (95%), simplicity (95%), and non-ambiguity (90%). A Cronbach's alpha of 0.93 indicated good internal consistency.

Conclusion: The HELMS evaluation questionnaire shows promise for evaluating similar mHealth-based lifestyle intervention programs globally.

Keywords: evaluation questionnaire; implementation outcomes; metabolic health; mobile health; preconception care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the validation process of the HELMS evaluation questionnaire.

References

    1. United Nations Population Fund The Problem with “Too Few” [Internet] 2022. [(accessed on 2 August 2023)]. Available online: https://www.unfpa.org/swp2023/too-few#:~:text=Worldwide%2C%20fertility%2....
    1. Ramanarayanan D., Barnes S.B., Kumler A. Global Health & Gender Policy Brief: Global Fertility Rates and the Role of Infertility [Internet] 2022. [(accessed on 4 September 2023)]. Available online: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/global-health-gender-policy-bri....
    1. Yap F., Loy S.L., Ku C.W., Chua M.C., Godfrey K.M., Chan J.K. A golden thread approach to transforming maternal and child health in Singapore. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22:561. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04893-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Obesity and Overweight [Internet] 2021. [(accessed on 2 August 2023)]. World Health Organization. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
    1. Leddy M.A., Power M.L., Schulkin J. The impact of maternal obesity on maternal and fetal health. Rev. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;1:170–178. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources