Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 18;24(18):6043.
doi: 10.3390/s24186043.

The FeetMe® Insoles System: Repeatability, Standard Error of Measure, and Responsiveness

Affiliations

The FeetMe® Insoles System: Repeatability, Standard Error of Measure, and Responsiveness

Nathan Martin et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional motion analysis using optoelectronic cameras and force platforms is typically used to quantify gait disorders. However, these systems have various limitations, particularly when assessing patients in an ecological environment. To address these limitations, several wearable devices have been developed. However, few studies have reported metrological information regarding their repeatability and sensitivity to change.

Methods: A healthy adult performed 6 min walking tests with FeetMe® system insoles under different walking conditions overground and on a treadmill. The standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimum detectable differences (MDDs), and the effect size (ES) were calculated for spatio-temporal parameters, and the ground reaction force was calculated from the 16,000 steps recorded.

Results: SEM values were below 3.9% for the ground reaction force and below 6.8% for spatio-temporal parameters. ES values were predominantly high, with 72.9% of cases between overground and treadmill conditions with induced asymmetry, and 64.5% of cases between treadmill conditions with and without induced asymmetry exhibiting an ES greater than 1.2. The minimum detectable differences ranged from 4.5% to 10.7% for ground reaction forces and 2.1% to 18.9% for spatio-temporal parameters.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the FeetMe® system is a reliable solution. The sensitivity to change showed that these instrumented insoles can effectively reflect patient asymmetry and progress.

Keywords: gait; insoles; minimum detectable change; wearable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baker R., Esquenazi A., Benedetti M.G., Desloovere K. Gait Analysis: Clinical Facts. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2016;52:560–574. - PubMed
    1. Leboeuf F., Baker R., Barré A., Reay J., Jones R., Sangeux M. The Conventional Gait Model, an Open-Source Implementation That Reproduces the Past but Prepares for the Future. Gait Posture. 2019;69:126–129. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.04.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roche N., Bonnyaud C., Reynaud V., Bensmail D., Pradon D., Esquenazi A. Motion Analysis for the Evaluation of Muscle Overactivity: A Point of View. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2019;62:442–452. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.06.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Del Din S., Godfrey A., Rochester L. Validation of an Accelerometer to Quantify a Comprehensive Battery of Gait Characteristics in Healthy Older Adults and Parkinson’s Disease: Toward Clinical and at Home Use. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2016;20:838–847. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2419317. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bussmann J., Veltink P., Koelma F., Van Lummel R., Stam H. Ambulatory Monitoring of Mobility-Related Activities: The Initial Phase of the Development of an Activity Monitor. Eur. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1995;5:2–7.

LinkOut - more resources