The FeetMe® Insoles System: Repeatability, Standard Error of Measure, and Responsiveness
- PMID: 39338788
- PMCID: PMC11435551
- DOI: 10.3390/s24186043
The FeetMe® Insoles System: Repeatability, Standard Error of Measure, and Responsiveness
Erratum in
-
Correction: Martin et al. The FeetMe® Insoles System: Repeatability, Standard Error of Measure, and Responsiveness. Sensors 2024, 24, 6043.Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 13;25(10):3061. doi: 10.3390/s25103061. Sensors (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40432044 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Three-dimensional motion analysis using optoelectronic cameras and force platforms is typically used to quantify gait disorders. However, these systems have various limitations, particularly when assessing patients in an ecological environment. To address these limitations, several wearable devices have been developed. However, few studies have reported metrological information regarding their repeatability and sensitivity to change.
Methods: A healthy adult performed 6 min walking tests with FeetMe® system insoles under different walking conditions overground and on a treadmill. The standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimum detectable differences (MDDs), and the effect size (ES) were calculated for spatio-temporal parameters, and the ground reaction force was calculated from the 16,000 steps recorded.
Results: SEM values were below 3.9% for the ground reaction force and below 6.8% for spatio-temporal parameters. ES values were predominantly high, with 72.9% of cases between overground and treadmill conditions with induced asymmetry, and 64.5% of cases between treadmill conditions with and without induced asymmetry exhibiting an ES greater than 1.2. The minimum detectable differences ranged from 4.5% to 10.7% for ground reaction forces and 2.1% to 18.9% for spatio-temporal parameters.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the FeetMe® system is a reliable solution. The sensitivity to change showed that these instrumented insoles can effectively reflect patient asymmetry and progress.
Keywords: gait; insoles; minimum detectable change; wearable.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of feetme insoles with a motion capture system coupled to force plates for assessing gait and posture.Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96878-8. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40251254 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability and minimum detectable change of measures of gait in children during walking and running on an instrumented treadmill.Gait Posture. 2020 Jan;75:105-108. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Oct 7. Gait Posture. 2020. PMID: 31648119
-
Are wearable insoles a validated tool for quantifying transfemoral amputee gait asymmetry?Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Oct;43(5):492-499. doi: 10.1177/0309364619865814. Epub 2019 Jul 31. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019. PMID: 31364482
-
Influence of body weight unloading on human gait characteristics: a systematic review.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Jun 20;15(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0380-0. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 29925400 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing Intelligent Shoes with Gait Analysis: A Review on the Spatiotemporal Estimation Techniques.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 10;24(24):7880. doi: 10.3390/s24247880. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39771619 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Correction: Martin et al. The FeetMe® Insoles System: Repeatability, Standard Error of Measure, and Responsiveness. Sensors 2024, 24, 6043.Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 13;25(10):3061. doi: 10.3390/s25103061. Sensors (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40432044 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baker R., Esquenazi A., Benedetti M.G., Desloovere K. Gait Analysis: Clinical Facts. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2016;52:560–574. - PubMed
-
- Del Din S., Godfrey A., Rochester L. Validation of an Accelerometer to Quantify a Comprehensive Battery of Gait Characteristics in Healthy Older Adults and Parkinson’s Disease: Toward Clinical and at Home Use. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2016;20:838–847. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2419317. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bussmann J., Veltink P., Koelma F., Van Lummel R., Stam H. Ambulatory Monitoring of Mobility-Related Activities: The Initial Phase of the Development of an Activity Monitor. Eur. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1995;5:2–7.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources