Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Aug 31;16(9):1398.
doi: 10.3390/v16091398.

Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: A Comparison of Two Concentration Methods

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: A Comparison of Two Concentration Methods

Christina Diamanti et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

Wastewater surveillance is crucial for the epidemiological monitoring of SARS-CoV-2. Various concentration techniques, such as skimmed milk flocculation (SMF) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, are employed to isolate the virus effectively. This study aims to compare these two methods and determine the one with the superior recovery rates. From February to December 2021, 24-h wastewater samples were collected from the Ioannina Wastewater Treatment Plant's inlet and processed using both techniques. Subsequent viral genome isolation and a real-time RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 were performed. The quantitative analysis demonstrated a higher detection sensitivity with a PEG-based concentration than SMF. Moreover, when the samples were positive by both methods, PEG consistently yielded higher viral loads. These findings underscore the need for further research into concentration methodologies and the development of precise protocols to enhance epidemiological surveillance through wastewater analysis.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; polyethylene glycol; skimmed milk flocculation; wastewater surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plots for genome copies/L according to the two concentration methods.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage reduction in the results of the two methods and their comparative differences. Figure 2 presents a time series analysis of the data, illustrating that the proportions of positive results for both methods were consistently concordant over the entire evaluated time frame.

References

    1. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19-11 March 2020. [(accessed on 27 August 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-genera....
    1. Gao Q.Y., Chen Y.X., Fang J.Y. 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection and Gastrointestinal Tract. J. Dig. Dis. 2020;21:125–126. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12851. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holshue M.L., DeBolt C., Lindquist S., Lofy K.H., Wiesman J., Bruce H., Spitters C., Ericson K., Wilkerson S., Tural A., et al. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. New Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:929–936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiehao C., Jin X., Daojiong L., Zhi Y., Lei X., Zhenghai Q., Yuehua Z., Hua Z., Ran J., Pengcheng L., et al. A Case Series of Children With 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection: Clinical and Epidemiological Features. Clin. Infect. Dis.: An Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2020;71:1547–1551. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa198. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wölfel R., Corman V.M., Guggemos W., Seilmaier M., Zange S., Müller M.A., Niemeyer D., Jones T.C., Vollmar P., Rothe C., et al. Virological Assessment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581:465–469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources