Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 28;12(9):975.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines12090975.

A Single-Component Multilayered Self-Assembling Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine Based on Extracellular Domains of Matrix Protein 2 against Both Influenza A and B

Affiliations

A Single-Component Multilayered Self-Assembling Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine Based on Extracellular Domains of Matrix Protein 2 against Both Influenza A and B

Yi-Nan Zhang et al. Vaccines (Basel). .

Abstract

The development of an effective and broadly protective influenza vaccine against circulating and emerging strains remains elusive. In this study, we evaluated a potentially universal influenza vaccine based on single-component self-assembling protein nanoparticles (1c-SApNPs) presenting the conserved matrix protein 2 ectodomain (M2e) from influenza A and B viruses (IAV and IBV, respectively). We previously designed a tandem antigen comprising three IAV M2e domains of human, avian/swine, and human/swine origins (termed M2ex3). The M2ex3-presenting 1c-SApNPs conferred complete protection in mice against sequential lethal challenges with H1N1 and H3N2. To broaden this protection to cover IBVs, we designed a series of antigens incorporating different arrangements of three IAV M2e domains and three copies of IBV M2e. Tandem repeats of IAV and IBV (termed influenza A-B) M2e arrayed on the I3-01v9a 60-mer 1c-SApNP, when formulated with an oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant, generated greater M2e-specific immunogenicity and protective efficacy than the soluble influenza A-B M2e trimer, indicated by higher survival rates and reduced weight loss post-challenge. Importantly, one of the influenza A-B M2e SApNP constructs elicited 100% protection against a lethal influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) challenge in mice and 70% protection against a lethal influenza B/Florida/4/2006 (Yamagata lineage) challenge, the latter of which has not been reported in the literature to date. Our study thus provides a promising M2e-based single-component universal vaccine candidate against the two major types of influenza virus circulating in humans.

Keywords: M2e; antibody; influenza A; influenza B; protein nanoparticle; universal influenza vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jiang Zhu serves as the Co-Founder, Interim Chief Scientific Officer, Consultant, and Scientific Advisory Board member of Uvax Bio, LLC, and holds associated financial interests. Other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design and in vitro characterization of influenza A-B M2e-based immunogens. (A) Top left: Amino acid sequences for influenza A M2e from human (UniProt: P06821, residue 2–24), avian/swine (residue 2–24) [16], and human/swine (residue 2–24) [16] and influenza B M2e from human (UniProt: A4D452, residue 2–9). Top right: Series of designed antigen sequences for influenza A-B M2exA3B3, M2exB3A3, M2e(AB)x3, and M2e(BA)x3 constructs. A glycine (G4) linker was added between any two adjacent M2e peptides, regardless of IAV and IBV M2e. Bottom: Schematics of influenza A-B M2e antigens consisting of various arrangements of human, avian, and swine IAV M2e plus three copies of IBV M2e displaying on I3-01v9a-LD7-PADRE (or simply I3-01v9a-L7P) SApNPs. (B) SEC profiles of the M2exA3B3-5GS-1TD0 trimer and M2exA3B3-, M2exB3A3-, M2e(AB)x3-, and M2e(BA)x3-presenting I3-01v9a SApNPs. The trimer was analyzed on a Superdex 75 Increase 10/300 GL column and four SApNPs were analyzed using a Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL column. (C) BN-PAGE for mAb148-purified influenza A-B M2e I3-01v9a SApNPs. (D) DLS profiles of mAb148-purified influenza A-B M2e I3-01v9a SApNPs. Average particle sizes derived from DLS are labeled. (E) nsEM micrographs of mAb148-purified influenza A-B M2e I3-01v9a-L7P SApNPs. (F) ELISA analysis of the M2eA3B3-5GS-1TD0 trimer and M2exA3B3-, M2exB3A3-, M2e(AB)x3-, and M2e(BA)x3-presenting I3-01v9a SApNPs binding to mAb148 (left) and mAb65 (right) before and after heating to 50 °C, 60 °C, and 70 °C for 30 min.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Protective efficacy of influenza A-B M2e-based trimer and SApNP vaccines in mice. (A) Determination of lethal dose 50 (LD50) for mouse-adapted A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) and mouse-adapted B/Florida/4/2006 (Yamagata lineage) through benchmark challenge studies (n = 10 mice/virus dilution). Mice were challenged with various dilutions of virus stock through nasal injection, with survival, weight loss, and morbidity monitored for 14 days post-challenge. (B) Schematic representation of mouse immunization, blood collection, and sequential challenges. Mice were immunized with the influenza A-B M2e 1TD0 trimer or SApNPs adjuvanted with AddaVax (AV) and then challenged using the LD50 × 10 of mouse-adapted A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) or LD50 × 5 of mouse-adapted B/Florida/4/2006 (Yamagata lineage) at weeks 6 or 10. (C) Survival rates and weight loss of vaccinated mice after the first challenge with mouse-adapted A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) followed by the second challenge with mouse-adapted B/Florida/4/2006 (Yamagata lineage). Mice were monitored for survival, weight loss, and morbidity for 14 days. Tested groups (n = 10 mice/group) included mice immunized with influenza A-B M2exA3B3 1TD0 trimer and four SApNPs (10 μg/mouse), naïve mice as a negative control, and strain-matched inactivated A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 virus (10 μg/mouse) as a positive control for the first mouse-adapted A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) challenge. (D) Survival rates and weight loss of vaccinated mice after the first challenge with mouse-adapted B/Florida/4/2006 followed by the second challenge with mouse-adapted A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1). A group in which mice were immunized with inactivated B/Florida/4/2006 (Yamagata) virus was included as a positive control for the first challenge with strain-matched mouse-adapted B/Florida/4/2006. Images of mouse immunization, virus challenge, and blood collection were created with BioRender.com (accessed on 21 May 2024).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Immunogenicity of influenza A-B M2e-based trimer and SApNP vaccines assessed by serum binding to M2e trimer probes and homotetrameric M2e on influenza-infected cells. (A) ELISA curves showing the influenza A-B M2e-immune sera of individual mice (n = 10 mice) binding to sequence-matched M2e coating antigen (M2exA3B3-5GS-foldon, M2exB3A3-5GS-foldon, M2e[AB]x3-5GS-foldon, and M2e[BA]x3-5GS-foldon). (B) Influenza A-B M2e vaccine-induced serum binding antibody responses at weeks 2 and 5 were measured by half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) titers. The assay was performed in duplicate with a starting serum dilution of 40× followed by seven 10-fold titrations. (C) Serum binding to M2e on the surface of MDCK cells infected with two IAVs, A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 (H1N1) and A/Hong Kong/1/1968 (H3N2), and two IBVs, B/Florida/4/2006 (Yamagata lineage) and B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Victoria lineage). Antibody mAb148 was used as a positive control for IAVs and a negative control for IBVs. The assay was performed in duplicate with a starting serum dilution of 40 times followed by five 5-fold titrations. Antibody mAb148 was diluted to 10 μg/mL followed by five 5-fold titrations. The statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison post hoc test for each time point (B) and influenza virus strain (C). For significance, ns (not significant), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Krammer F., Smith G.J.D., Fouchier R.A.M., Peiris M., Kedzierska K., Doherty P.C., Palese P., Shaw M.L., Treanor J., Webster R.G., et al. Influenza. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2018;4:3. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0002-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paules C., Subbarao K. Influenza. Lancet. 2017;390:697–708. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30129-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouvier N.M., Palese P. The biology of influenza viruses. Vaccine. 2008;26:D49–D53. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dou D., Revol R., Östbye H., Wang H., Daniels R. Influenza A virus cell entry, replication, virion assembly and movement. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1581. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01581. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steinhauer D.A., Skehel J.J. Genetics of influenza viruses. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2002;36:305–332. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.36.052402.152757. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources