Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;59(6):1217-1224.
doi: 10.1002/ijop.13247. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

The effect of humanising nature

Belinda J Flannery  1 , Natasha M Loi  1 , Nicola S Schutte  1
Affiliations

The effect of humanising nature

Belinda J Flannery et al. Int J Psychol. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Humans may have an innate need to affiliate with nature; this need has been termed biophilia. Humanising nature may connect to biophilia. An experimental design with 167 participants tested the hypothesis that a humanised description of the functioning of trees that focused on similarities between tree and human functioning would have a greater impact than a description of purely biological functions of trees. Participants randomly assigned to the humanising nature condition had higher mean scores for positive affect and empathy related to the target aspect of nature as well as greater pro-environmental intention. A MANOVA showed that the humanising nature condition had a significantly greater overall impact than the control condition. Positive affect and empathy were significantly different between groups. A serial mediation analysis found that positive affect and empathy connected the intervention with pro-environmental intention. Humanising nature holds promise as an approach to meeting biophilia needs. The findings may be globally relevant to the interaction of humans with nature.

Keywords: Biophilia; Empathy; Humanising nature; Nature; Positive affect.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749‐5978(91)90020‐T
    1. Australian Earth Laws Centre. (2023). Rights of nature. https://www.earthlaws.org.au/aelc/rights‐of‐nature/#statements
    1. Barbiero, G., & Berto, R. (2021). Biophilia as evolutionary adaptation: An onto‐and phylogenetic framework for biophilic design. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 700709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700709
    1. Barbiero, G., Berto, R., Venturella, A., & Maculan, N. (2021). Bracing biophilia: When biophilic design promotes pupil's attentional performance, perceived restorativeness and affiliation with nature. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668‐021‐01903‐1
    1. Barragan‐Jason, G., de Mazancourt, C., Parmesan, C., Singer, M. C., & Loreau, M. (2022). Human–nature connectedness as a pathway to sustainability: A global meta‐analysis. Conservation Letters, 15(1), e12852. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12852

LinkOut - more resources