Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar;603(7):1729-1779.
doi: 10.1113/JP284740. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

Neurocardiology: translational advancements and potential

Affiliations
Review

Neurocardiology: translational advancements and potential

N Herring et al. J Physiol. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

In our original white paper published in the The Journal of Physiology in 2016, we set out our knowledge of the structural and functional organization of cardiac autonomic control, how it remodels during disease, and approaches to exploit such knowledge for autonomic regulation therapy. The aim of this update is to build on this original blueprint, highlighting the significant progress which has been made in the field since and major challenges and opportunities that exist with regard to translation. Imbalances in autonomic responses, while beneficial in the short term, ultimately contribute to the evolution of cardiac pathology. As our understanding emerges of where and how to target in terms of actuators (including the heart and intracardiac nervous system (ICNS), stellate ganglia, dorsal root ganglia (DRG), vagus nerve, brainstem, and even higher centres), there is also a need to develop sensor technology to respond to appropriate biomarkers (electrophysiological, mechanical, and molecular) such that closed-loop autonomic regulation therapies can evolve. The goal is to work with endogenous control systems, rather than in opposition to them, to improve outcomes.

Keywords: autonomic nervous system; cardiac function; parasympathetic; sympathetic nervous system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Network interactions occurring within and between peripheral ganglia and the central nervous system for autonomic control of the heart
The cardiac nervous system is composed of multiple (distributed) processing centres from which independent and interdependent neural feedback and feed‐forward neural circuits interact to control regional cardiac electrical and mechanical function. Afferent projections are indicated in blue and efferent projections in red (dashed lines, preganglionic; continuous lines, postganglionic). The intrinsic cardiac nervous system (ICNS) possesses sympathetic (Sympath) and parasympathetic (Parasym) efferent postganglionic neurons, local circuit neurons (LCN) and afferent neurons. Extracardiac intrathoracic ganglia contain afferent neurons, LCN and sympathetic efferent postganglionic neurons. Neurons in intrinsic cardiac and extracardiac networks form nested feedback loops that act in concert with CNS feedback loops (spinal cord, brainstem, hypothalamus and forebrain) to coordinate cardiac function on a beat‐to‐beat basis. These systems demonstrate plasticity which underlies adaptations to acute and chronic stressors. Ang I, angiotensin I; Ang II, angiotensin II; AC, adenylate cyclase.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Key structures of the central autonomic network
The anatomical location of key structures in the central autonomic network.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Neurocardiology is based on the premise that cardiac control must be evaluated in the context of the end‐organ substrate and interdependent interactions within multiple levels of the cardiac nervous system
Imbalances in autonomic responses, while beneficial in the short term, ultimately contribute to the evolution of cardiac pathology. As our understanding of where to target emerges in terms of actuators (including the heart and intracardiac nervous system (ICNS), stellate ganglia, dorsal root ganglia (DRG), brainstem and even higher centres), there is also a need to develop sensor technology to respond to appropriate biomarkers (electrophysiological, mechanical and molecular) such that closed‐loop autonomic regulation therapies can evolve. The goal is to work with endogenous control systems, rather than in opposition to them, to improve outcomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abboud, F. M. , & Benson, C. J. (2015). ASICs and cardiovascular homeostasis. Neuropharmacology, 94, 87–98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abboud, H. , Berroir, S. , Labreuche, J. , Orjuela, K. , Amarenco, P. , & Investigators, G. (2006). Insular involvement in brain infarction increases risk for cardiac arrhythmia and death. Annals of Neurology, 59(4), 691–699. - PubMed
    1. Abdala, A. P. , Rybak, I. A. , Smith, J. C. , & Paton, J. F. (2009). Abdominal expiratory activity in the rat brainstem‐spinal cord in situ: Patterns, origins and implications for respiratory rhythm generation. The Journal of Physiology, 587(Pt 14), 3539–3559. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Accorsi‐Mendonca, D. , & Machado, B. H. (2013). Synaptic transmission of baro‐ and chemoreceptors afferents in the NTS second order neurons. Autonomic Neuroscience, 175(1–2), 3–8. - PubMed
    1. Ackermann, D. M. Jr. , Bhadra, N. , Foldes, E. L. , & Kilgore, K. L. (2011). Separated interface nerve electrode prevents direct current induced nerve damage. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 201(1), 173–176. - PMC - PubMed