Changes in the Centers of Rotation in Different Prosthetic Segments Following Continuous Two-Level Cervical Disc Replacement: A Retrospective Study
- PMID: 39341277
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.110
Changes in the Centers of Rotation in Different Prosthetic Segments Following Continuous Two-Level Cervical Disc Replacement: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
Objective: To observe the short-term to medium-term therapeutic effects and radiological outcomes of adjacent 2-level cervical spondylosis treated with artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) using Mobi-C and Bryan discs. To observe changes and discrepancies in the flexion-extension centers of rotation (FE-COR) of different ACDR segments.
Methods: Twenty-four patients undergoing 2-level (C4/5 and C5/6) ACDR were analyzed retrospectively (11 patients in the Mobi-C group and 13 patients in the Bryan group). Clinical outcomes were assessed using modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale. Preoperative and 2 years' follow-up radiographs were collected to compare total cervical spine curvature (C2-C7) range of motion (ROM), upper and lower ACDR segmental ROM, and the operated adjacent segmental ROM. The FE-COR of the ACDR segment was measured using the mid-plumb line method. The degree of disc degeneration in the adjacent segment was observed.
Results: At the 2 years' follow-up, in both group, the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score increased significantly, and the Neck Disability Index and neck and upper extremity visual analog scale scores decreased significantly compared with preoperative (P < 0.05). There were no significant statistical differences in postoperative scores between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The overall cervical ROM, the upper and lower segmental ROM at the 2 years' follow-up showed no significant statistical differences compared with the preoperative period (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the adjacent segmental ROMs compared with the preoperative period (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the measurements of the ROM at each time points between the Mobi-C Group and the Bryan Group (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the preoperative FE-COR-X (indicating the horizontal position of the point in the coordinate system) and FE-COR-Y (indicating the vertical position of the point in the coordinate system) of upper or lower ACDR segments between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). At the 2 years' follow-up, there were significant differences both in FE-COR-X and FE-COR-Y between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). For the Mobi-C group, in both the upper and lower segment, the FE-COR-X significantly increased compared with preoperative (P < 0.05), while the FE-COR-Y decreased compared with preoperative (P < 0.05). For the Bryan group, no significant changes were observed in the upper or lower segment in both FE-COR-X and FE-COR-Y compared with preoperative (P > 0.05). Fourty-eight adjacent segments (24 superior and 24 inferior segments) were included in the studies of adjacent segment disease. Four segments showed imaging adjacent segment disease (4/48, 8.33%) in 4 patients, of which 2 were mild and 2 were moderate according to the grading criteria. Among them, 2 were from the Mobi-C group and 2 were from the Bryan group. No severe imaging degeneration was observed.
Conclusions: In continuous 2-level cervical ACDR surgery, both Mobi-C and Bryan artificial cervical discs achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes in the short to medium term postoperatively. The FE-COR exhibited different trends of change. In the Mobi-C group, the FE-COR for both upper and lower segments shifted anteriorly and inferiorly, whereas in the Bryan group, whether upper or lower, the FE-COR remained closer to the preoperative state. The changes in FE-COR did not significantly affect the short-term to medium-term clinical outcomes postoperatively.
Keywords: Artificial cervical disc replacement; Bryan cervical artificial disc; Cervical spondylosis; Flexion-extension center of rotation; Mobi-C cervical artificial disc.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Kinematic status of Bryan and Mobi-C artificial cervical discs post cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05316-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39702339 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in the centre of rotation and the anterior bone loss of the vertebral body in Mobi-C artificial disc replacement segments after cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1265-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08047-y. Epub 2023 Nov 28. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38015272
-
Comparison of 10-year follow-up result of hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of contiguous three-level cervical degenerative disc diseases: risk factors for heterotopic ossification.Eur Spine J. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09329-3. Online ahead of print. Eur Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40913198
-
Kinematics of the cervical adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S85-95. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d6628. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22885834
-
Efficacy and safety of Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e8504. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008504. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29245217 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Kinematic status of Bryan and Mobi-C artificial cervical discs post cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):857. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05316-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39702339 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous