Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):1065.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09790-3.

Antimicrobial Sub-MIC induces Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation without affecting the bacterial count

Affiliations

Antimicrobial Sub-MIC induces Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation without affecting the bacterial count

Raghda Elawady et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Biofilm formation is an essential virulence factor that creates a highly protected growth mode for Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) to survive in any hostile environment. Antibiotic sub-minimal inhibitory concentration (sub-MIC) may modulate the biofilm formation ability of bacterial pathogens, thereby affecting bacterial pathogenesis and infection outcomes. Intense antimicrobial therapy to treat biofilm-associated infections can control the pathogenic infection aggravation but cannot guarantee its complete eradication.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the sub-MICs effect of 5 different antimicrobial classes on biofilm-forming capacity among Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates using three different biofilm quantitation techniques.

Methods: In this study, the effects of 5 different antimicrobial agents, namely, azithromycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, and imipenem, at sub-MICs of 12.5%, 25%, and 50% were tested on 5 different clinical isolates of S. aureus. The biofilms formed in the absence and presence of different antimicrobial sub-MICs were then assessed using the following three different techniques: the crystal violet (CV) staining method, the quantitative PCR (qPCR) method, and the spread plate method (SPM).

Results: Biofilm formation was significantly induced in 64% of the tested conditions using the CV technique. On the other hand, the qPCR quantifying the total bacterial count and the SPM quantifying the viable bacterial count showed significant induction only in 24% and 17.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). The difference between CV and the other techniques indicates an increase in biofilm biomass without an increase in bacterial growth. As expected, sub-MICs did not reduce the viable cell count, as shown by the SPM. The CV staining method revealed that sub-MICs of imipenem and ciprofloxacin had the highest significance rate (80%) showing an inductive effect on the biofilm development. On the other hand, doxycycline, azithromycin, and gentamicin displayed lower significance rates of 73%, 53%, and 47%, respectively.

Conclusion: Exposure to sub-MIC doses of antimicrobial agents induces the biofilm-forming capacity of S. aureus via increasing the total biomass without significantly affecting the bacterial growth of viable count.

Keywords: S. aureus; Biofilm biomass; Spread plate technique; Subinhibitory concentration; qPCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Graphical representation of the study abstract. IMP; imipenem, CIP; ciprofloxacin, AZM; azithromycin, Dox; doxycycline, GEN; gentamicin, CV; crystal violet, SPM; Spread plate method, PCR; Polymerase chain reaction, MIC; Minimum inhibitory concentration
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bar plots with error bars (mean ± SD) of optical density (OD) with absorbance at 620 nm of S. aureus isolates (n = 5) by CV staining method at baseline (no antimicrobial) and at 3 different sub-MICs (12.5%, 25% and 50%) of azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, gentamicin and imipenem, respectively. All data were normalized to their mean baseline (no antimicrobial). *Asterisks indicate the statistical significance obtained by paired t- test. The number of asterisks indicates the significance level (*p value < 0.05, **p value < 0.005, ***p value < 0.0005)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bar plots with error bars (mean ± SD) of CFU count of S. aureus isolates (n = 5) by qPCR method at baseline (no antimicrobial) and at 3 different sub-MICs (12.5%, 25% and 50%) of azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, gentamicin and imipenem, respectively. All data were normalized to their mean baseline (no-antimicrobial).*Asterisks indicate the statistical significance obtained by paired t- test. The number of asterisks indicates the significance level (*p value < 0.05, **p value < 0.005, ***p value < 0.0005)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Bar plots with error bars (mean ± SD) of viable cell count of S. aureus isolates (n = 5) by spread plate method at baseline (no antimicrobial) and at 3 different sub-MICs (12.5%, 25% and 50%) of azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, gentamicin and imipenem, respectively. All data were normalized to their mean baseline (no antimicrobial). *Asterisks indicate the statistical significance obtained by paired t- test. The number of asterisks indicates the significance level (*p value < 0.05, **p value < 0.005, ***p value < 0.0005)

References

    1. Lebeaux D, Ghigo J-M. Management of biofilm-associated infections: what can we expect from recent research on biofilm lifestyles? Med Stud. 2012;28(8–9):727–39. - PubMed
    1. Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(9):623–33. - PubMed
    1. Barnes AM, Ballering KS, Leibman RS, Wells CL, Dunny GM. Enterococcus faecalis produces abundant extracellular structures containing DNA in the absence of cell lysis during early biofilm formation. mBio. 2012;3(4):e00193–00112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davies J, Spiegelman GB, Yim G. The world of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006;9(5):445–53. - PubMed
    1. Svarcova V, Zdenkova K, Sulakova M, Demnerova K, Pazlarova J. Contribution to determination of extracellular DNA origin in the biofilm matrix. J Basic Microbiol. 2021;61(7):652–61. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources