Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):209.
doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01596-4.

Importance of biopsy sample length for cancer diagnosis during trans-perineal prostate biopsy

Affiliations

Importance of biopsy sample length for cancer diagnosis during trans-perineal prostate biopsy

Zaisheng Zhu et al. BMC Urol. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify the factors that determine the minimum length of biopsy sample required for accurate diagnosis.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1202 cases that underwent rectal ultrasound-guided trans-perineal prostate biopsy (TPB) with standardized biopsy surgical procedures and pathological evaluation. Logistic regression correlation analysis and the imbalance between groups was eliminated by propensity score matching of patients' own factors between groups (positive group and negative group). ROC curve optimal threshold analysis were performed to identify the independent factors associated with cancer detection rate and the minimum length of biopsy sample required for accurate diagnosis.

Results: The study included 1202 cases that underwent standardized 8-18 needle initial puncture biopsies from June 2020 to October 2023. The cancer detection rate was 40.02% (481/1202), with Gleason scores of 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 in 164, 134, 107, 67, and 9 patients, respectively. The percentage of patients with clinical significance (International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) ≥ 2) was 65.90% (317/481). Multivariate analysis showed that age,prostate-specific antigen(PSA), prostate volume,positive multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) and length of biopsy samples were significant factors (P < 0.05)。Interestingly, biopsy sample length did not correlate with the prostate volume (Pearson correlation P = 0.069). ROC curve analysis: The area under the curve AUC for sample length were 0.674 and 0.664 at before and after propensity score matching,respectively; the optimal thresholds were 12.25 mm and 11.00mm at before and after propensity score matching,respectively.

Conclusion: The independent predictors of cancer detection rate during TPB are age, PSA, prostate volume, positive mp-MRI, and sample length. Among these, sample length is the most critical indicator affecting puncture quality, and the minimum value of biopsy sample length to be obtained is 11.00mm.

Keywords: Biopsy sample length; Diagnosis; Propensity score matching; Prostate tumor; Trans-perineal biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC curve analysis. The area under the curve AUC for age, PSA, mp-MRI, prostate volume and sample length were 0.629,0.717,0.671,0.617 (Since prostate is a negative indicator, the smaller the volume, the higher the diagnostic rate, so it was converted in a positive direction) and 0.674, respectively
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The area under the curve AUC for sample length were0.674 (A) and 0.664 (B) at before and after propensity score matching, respectively; the optimal thresholds for sample length were 12.25 mm (A) and 11.00mm (B) at before and after propensity score matching, respectively

Similar articles

References

    1. Okubo Y, Yamamoto Y, Sato S, et al. Diagnostic significance of reassessment of prostate biopsy specimens by experienced urological pathologists at a high-volume institution. Virchows Arch. 2022;480(5):979–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De La Rosette JJMCH, Wink MH, Mamoulakis C, et al. Optimizing prostate cancer detection: 8 versus 12-core biopsy protocol. J Urol. 2009;182(4):1329–36. - PubMed
    1. Chun FKH, Epstein JI, Ficarra V, et al. Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol. 2010;58(6):851–64. - PubMed
    1. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, et al. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1767–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Enzinger B, Pfitzinger PL, Ebner B, et al. Common errors, pitfalls, and management of complications of prostate biopsy : the most common diagnostic and procedural challenges of transrectal fusion prostate biopsy in the initial diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Urologie. 2023;62(5):479–86. - PubMed