Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 28;22(1):260.
doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03538-8.

Efficacy of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: a single-center retrospective analysis

Affiliations

Efficacy of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: a single-center retrospective analysis

Chunhui Ye et al. World J Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Objective The influence of macrovascular invasion on the therapeutic efficacy of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients has not been previously reported. This study primarily examines the therapeutic effect of ALPPS in treating HCC with macrovascular invasion. Methods 89 patients who underwent ALPPS at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from December 2016 to December 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on macrovascular invasion status: pure HCC, HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), and HCC with hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT). Outcome measures such as postoperative complications, liver hyperplasia rates, and survival times were compared across the groups. Results The study comprised 44 patients without macrovascular invasion and 45 cases with it, including 37 PVTT and 8 HVTT cases. Patients with PVTT or HVTT had a higher rate of complications and liver failure after the first ALPPS stage compared to those without macrovascular invasion (P = 0.018, P = 0.036). This trend was also observed in the stratified analysis of severe complications. However, no significant differences were found in these outcomes after the second ALPPS stage among the groups. The volume and rate of future liver remnant proliferation between the two stages of ALPPS were not statistically different among the groups, with median overall survival times of 42, 39, and 33 months, and progression-free survival times of 30, 24, and 14 months, respectively (P = 0.412 and P = 0.281). Conclusion ALPPS for HCC with macrovascular invasion was considered safe, feasible, and effective, as it achieved therapeutic effects comparable to those in cases without macrovascular invasion.

Keywords: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS); Efficacy; Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); Macrovascular invasion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors unanimously affirm that the research was carried out without any commercial or financial ties that might be perceived as potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The specific design scheme of this study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Surgical Procedure Flowchart. A and B represent the preoperative arterial and venous phase CT scans for a patient undergoing ALPPS, respectively; C, D, E, and F represent the preoperative volume estimation and planning 3D images, which were created using the IQQA 3D imaging system and based on enhanced CT data
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) This survival curve illustrated the comparison of postoperative overall survival times among the three patient groups. the log-rank test indicated that the differences were not statistically significant (X2 = 0.673, p = 0.412). (B) This survival curve compared the postoperative progression-free survival time among the three patient groups. The log-rank test indicated that the differences were not statistically significant (X2 = 1.61, p = 0.281)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beumer BR, De Wilde RF, Metselaar HJ, De Man RA, Polak WG, Ijzermans JN. The treatment effect of liver transplantation versus liver resection for HCC: a review and future perspectives [J]. Cancers. 2021;13(15):3730. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cannella R, Taibbi A, Porrello G, Burgio MD, Cabibbo G, Bartolotta TV. Hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion: multimodality imaging features for the diagnosis [J]. Diagn Interventional Radiol. 2020;26(6):531. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singal AG, Llovet JM, Yarchoan M, Mehta N, Heimbach JK, Dawson LA, et al. AASLD practice guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Hepatology. 2023;78(6):1922–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Govalan R, Lauzon M, Luu M, Ahn JC, Kosari K, Todo T, et al. Comparison of surgical resection and systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion: national cancer database analysis [J]. Liver Cancer. 2021;10(5):407–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kokudo T, Hasegawa K, Matsuyama Y, Takayama T, Izumi N, Kadoya M et al. Survival benefit of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with portal vein invasion [J]. J Hepatol, 2016: 938–43. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources