The debate over diagnosis related groups
- PMID: 3934232
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01326513
The debate over diagnosis related groups
Abstract
With the advent of the Prospective Payment System (PPS) using Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) as a classification method, the pros and cons of that mechanism have been sharply debated. Grouping the comments into categories related to administration/management, DRG system and quality of care, a review of relevant literature highlights the pertinent attitudes and views of professionals and organizations. Points constantly argued include data utilization, meaningful medical classifications, resource use, gaming, profit centers, patient homogeneity, severity of illness, length of stay, technology limitations and the erosion of standards.
Similar articles
-
PPS and quality care: can they coexist?Healthspan. 1986 Jan;3(1):15-8. Healthspan. 1986. PMID: 10311449 No abstract available.
-
DRG winners and losers affect profits under prospective payment.Healthc Financ Manage. 1985 Jul;39(7):62-8. Healthc Financ Manage. 1985. PMID: 10311154
-
DRGs: the counterrevolution in financing health care.Hastings Cent Rep. 1985 Jun;15(3):19-29. Hastings Cent Rep. 1985. PMID: 3926717 Review.
-
Measuring the effect of illness severity on revenue under DRGs.Healthc Financ Manage. 1985 Jul;39(7):52-3, 56-60. Healthc Financ Manage. 1985. PMID: 10311153
-
"Trade-off" between medical cost controls and quality of care? Maybe, maybe not! Part II.J Qual Assur. 1990 Apr-Jun;12(2):14-7, 43. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1990.tb00032.x. J Qual Assur. 1990. PMID: 10170552 Review.
Cited by
-
The Burden of Untreated HCV Infection in Hospitalized Inmates: a Hospital Utilization and Cost Analysis.J Urban Health. 2018 Aug;95(4):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0277-z. J Urban Health. 2018. PMID: 30027427 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous