Conduction system pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Results from International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS) Group
- PMID: 39343119
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.030
Conduction system pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Results from International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS) Group
Abstract
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a guideline-recommended therapy in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF, 36%-50%) and left bundle branch block or indication for ventricular pacing. Conduction system pacing (CSP) using left bundle branch area pacing or His bundle pacing has been shown to be a safe and physiologic alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP).
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between BVP and CSP for patients with HFmrEF undergoing CRT.
Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent BVP or CSP with HFmrEF between January 2018 and June 2023 at 16 international centers were included. The primary outcome was the composite end point of time to death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Secondary end points included change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and individual end points of death and HFH.
Results: A total of 1004 patients met inclusion criteria: BVP, 178; CSP, 826 (His bundle pacing, 154; left bundle branch area pacing, 672). Mean age was 73 ± 13 years; female, 34%; and LVEF, 42% ± 5%. Paced QRS duration in CSP was significantly narrower compared with BVP (129 ± 21 ms vs 144 ± 19 ms; P < .001). LVEF improved during follow-up in both groups (49% ± 10% vs 48% ± 10%; P = .32). CSP was independently associated with significant reduction in the primary end point of time to death or HFH compared with BVP (22% vs 34%; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.94; P = .025).
Conclusion: CSP was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with BVP in this large cohort of patients with HFmrEF undergoing CRT. Randomized controlled trials comparing CSP with BVP will be necessary to confirm these results.
Keywords: Biventricular pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Conduction system pacing; HFmrEF; Heart failure hospitalization; His bundle pacing; Left bundle branch area pacing; Mortality.
Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures P.V.: honoraria, consultant, research, fellowship support—Medtronic; consultant—Abbott, Eaglepoint LLC; honoraria—Boston Scientific, Biotronik; patent: HBP delivery tool. F.Z.: honoraria—Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and MicroPort; S.S.P.: honoraria—Medtronic; B.H.: speaker, consultant—Abbott; speaker, fellowship support—Medtronic; P.S.: honoraria—Medtronic; consultant—Medtronic, Abbott, Biotronik; M.J.: honoraria, consultant—Medtronic, Abbott; K.V.: consultant—Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific; institution has received research and educational grants from Abbott, Medtronic, Biosense Webster; Z.W.: honoraria—Medtronic, Boston Scientific; consultant—Medtronic, Abbott; K.C.: consultant and honoraria from Medtronic, Biotronik, and Abbott; M.G.C.: research support—PCORI, NIH, Abbott, Impulse Dynamics; honorarium—Impulse Dynamics; G.U.: consulting or speaking from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, GE Medical, Medtronic, Philips, Rhythm Science, and Zoll Medical; R.K.P.: honoraria, consultant, research, fellowship support—Medtronic, Abbott; O.C.: honoraria, consultant—Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and MicroPort. All others authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤50%: Results from the International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS).Heart Rhythm. 2025 Aug;22(8):2028-2037. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.005. Epub 2025 Apr 25. Heart Rhythm. 2025. PMID: 40288475
-
Improved outcomes of conduction system pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart Rhythm. 2023 Aug;20(8):1178-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.05.010. Epub 2023 May 10. Heart Rhythm. 2023. PMID: 37172670
-
Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Cardiac Resynchronization Pacing: Meta-Analysis on Outcomes in Patients with Non-Left Bundle Branch Block.Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 9;61(7):1240. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071240. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025. PMID: 40731870 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy.Heart Rhythm. 2022 Aug;19(8):1263-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.023. Epub 2022 Apr 29. Heart Rhythm. 2022. PMID: 35500791
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy risk stratified by magnetic resonance imaging and optimized by left bundle branch pacing: Results from long-term follow-up of MADURAI LBBP study.Heart Rhythm. 2025 Aug;22(8):2018-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.040. Epub 2025 Apr 26. Heart Rhythm. 2025. PMID: 40294735
Cited by
-
European Society of Cardiology (ESC) clinical consensus statement on indications for conduction system pacing, with special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC and endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.Europace. 2025 Mar 28;27(4):euaf050. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf050. Europace. 2025. PMID: 40159278 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Conduction System Pacing.J Clin Med. 2025 May 6;14(9):3212. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093212. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40364243 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous