Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;32(1):47-62.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16287-5. Epub 2024 Sep 29.

Surveillance-Associated Anxiety After Curative-Intent Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Surveillance-Associated Anxiety After Curative-Intent Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review

Rakhsha Khatri et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Regular surveillance imaging is commonly used after curative-intent resection of most solid-organ cancers to enable prompt diagnosis and management of recurrent disease. Given the fear of cancer recurrence, surveillance may lead to distress and anxiety ("scanxiety") but its frequency, severity, and management among cancer survivors are poorly understood.

Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases was conducted to evaluate existing literature on anxiety and emotional experiences associated with surveillance after curative-intent cancer surgery as well as interventions aimed at reducing scanxiety.

Results: Across the 22 included studies encompassing 8693 patients, reported rates of scanxiety varied significantly, but tended to decrease as time elapsed after surgery. Qualitative studies showed that scanxiety arises from various factors innate to the surveillance experience and is most prevalent in the scan-to-results waiting period. Common risk factors for scanxiety included sociodemographic and cancer-related characteristics, low coping self-efficacy, pre-existing anxiety, and low patient well-being. Conversely, reassurance was a positive aspect of surveillance reported in several studies. Trials evaluating the impact of interventions all focused on modifying the surveillance regimen compared with usual care, but none led to reduced rates of scanxiety.

Conclusions: Although scanxiety is nearly universal across multiple cancer types and patient populations, it is transient and generally limited in severity. Because existing trials evaluating interventions to reduce scanxiety have not identified effective strategies to date, future research is needed to identify interventions aimed at reducing their impact on high-risk individuals.

Keywords: Anxiety; Cancer surgery; Fear of recurrence; Follow-up care; Imaging; Psycho-oncology; Scanxiety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: There are no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA figure

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dinan MA, Curtis LH, Hammill BG, et al. Changes in the use and costs of diagnostic imaging among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, 1999–2006. JAMA. 2010;303:1625–31. 10.1001/jama.2010.460. - PubMed
    1. Scanxiety Feiler B. Fear of a postcancer ritual. Time. 2011;177:56. - PubMed
    1. Bui KT, Blinman P, Kiely BE, Brown C, Dhillon HM. Experiences with scans and scanxiety in people with advanced cancer: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:7441–9. 10.1007/s00520-021-06319-1. - PubMed
    1. Wernli K, Brandzel S, Buist D, et al. Is Breast MRI Better at Finding Second Breast Cancers Than Mammograms Alone for Breast Cancer Survivors? Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2019. Retrieved 8 January 2024 at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554228/. - PubMed
    1. Mathers SA, McKenzie GA, Robertson EM. A necessary evil: the experiences of men with prostate cancer undergoing imaging procedures. Radiography. 2011;17:284–91. 10.1016/j.radi.2011.06.005.

Publication types