Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Sep 29;24(1):1159.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04955-7.

Preventive effect of probiotics on oral mucositis induced by anticancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Preventive effect of probiotics on oral mucositis induced by anticancer therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Bo Yang et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a prevalent and painful complication in patients undergoing anticancer treatment, which significantly impacts patients' quality of life (QoL) and adherence to therapy. The use of oral probiotics as a preventive strategy for OM has shown promise, but the clinical evidence remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics in preventing OM caused by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted up to January 31, 2024, to identify eligible RCTs. The primary outcomes were the incidences of severe OM and all-grade OM. Secondary outcomes included rates of anticancer treatment completion, clinical response, requirement for enteral nutrition, time course of OM, body weight loss, QoL, and adverse events (AEs). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: A total of 12 RCTs involving 1,376 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Probiotics administration significantly reduced the risk of severe OM (RR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.53-0.72, P < 0.001) and all-grade OM (RR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.82-0.98, P = 0.016) compared to the control group. Multi-strain probiotics formulations were more effective than single-strain probiotics in preventing severe OM (P = 0.011). There were no significant differences between the probiotics and control groups regarding anticancer treatment completion (RR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.98-1.08, P = 0.198), clinical response to therapy (RR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.94-1.17, P = 0.406), or the need for enteral nutrition (RR = 1.28, 95%CI: 0.49-3.35, P = 0.680). AEs related to probiotics were rare, with no serious AEs attributable to probiotics use.

Conclusions: Oral probiotics are both safe and effective in preventing and reducing the severity of OM in patients undergoing anticancer therapy. Multi-strain probiotics demonstrate superior efficacy compared to single-strain probiotics. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and optimize probiotic treatment strategies for cancer patients.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; Meta-analysis; Oral mucositis; Probiotics; Radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of literature search
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias assessment by RoB 2 tool. R: bias arising from the randomization process; D: bias due to deviations from intended interventions; Mi: bias due to missing outcome data; Me: bias in measurement of the outcome; S: bias in selection of the reported result; O: overall bias
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of the incidence of severe OM induced by anticancer therapy
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of incidence of severe OM in subgroups stratified by probiotic strains
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot of the incidence of all-grade OM induced by anticancer therapy
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Funnel plot of severe OM after trim-and-fill analysis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Elad S, et al. MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer. 2020;126:4423–31. 10.1002/cncr.33100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowen JM, Wardill HR. Advances in the understanding and management of mucositis during stem cell transplantation. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017;11:341–6. 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000310. - PubMed
    1. Silverman S. Jr. Diagnosis and management of oral mucositis. J Support Oncol. 2007;5:13–21. - PubMed
    1. Bruno JS, et al. From pathogenesis to intervention: the importance of the Microbiome in oral Mucositis. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24. 10.3390/ijms24098274. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonis ST, et al. Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients. Cancer. 2004;100:1995–2025. 10.1002/cncr.20162. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources