Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 1;45(1):1-11.
doi: 10.3343/alm.2024.0258. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

Toward High-Quality Real-World Laboratory Data in the Era of Healthcare Big Data

Affiliations
Review

Toward High-Quality Real-World Laboratory Data in the Era of Healthcare Big Data

Sollip Kim et al. Ann Lab Med. .

Abstract

With Industry 4.0, big data and artificial intelligence have become paramount in the field of medicine. Electronic health records, the primary source of medical data, are not collected for research purposes but represent real-world data; therefore, they have various constraints. Although structured, laboratory data often contain unstandardized terminology or missing information. The major challenge lies in the lack of standardization of test results in terms of metrology, which complicates comparisons across laboratories. In this review, we delve into the essential components necessary for integrating real-world laboratory data into high-quality big data, including the standardization of terminology, data formats, equations, and the harmonization and standardization of results. Moreover, we address the transference and adjustment of laboratory results, along with the certification for quality of laboratory data. By discussing these critical aspects, we seek to shed light on the challenges and opportunities inherent to utilizing real-world laboratory data within the framework of healthcare big data and artificial intelligence.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Big data; Data quality; Harmonization; Laboratory medicine; Real-world data; Standardization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Improving patient outcomes through analytics performed on big data gathered from various sources.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. ‘Big data-to-big data loop’ of laboratory tests in the Industry 4.0 era.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Essential components for building high-quality laboratory big data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2:230–43. doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000101. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ehsani-Moghaddam B, Martin K, Queenan JA. Data quality in healthcare: A report of practical experience with the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network data. Health Inf Manag. 2021;50:88–92. doi: 10.1177/1833358319887743. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daniel C, Serre P, Orlova N, Bréant S, Paris N, Griffon N. Initializing a hospital-wide data quality program. The AP-HP experience. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019;181:104804. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.10.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aerts H, Kalra D, Sáez C, Ramírez-Anguita JM, Mayer MA, Garcia-Gomez JM, et al. Quality of hospital electronic health record (EHR) data based on the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) in heart failure: pilot data quality assessment study. JMIR Med Inform. 2021;9:e27842. doi: 10.2196/27842.b283a765906646d7ae661c0561f87815 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liaw ST, Guo JGN, Ansari S, Jonnagaddala J, Godinho MA, Borelli AJ, et al. Quality assessment of real-world data repositories across the data life cycle: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28:1591–9. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa340. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources