Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily basal insulin in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the ONWARDS 1, 2 and 4 trials
- PMID: 39344833
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.15960
Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily basal insulin in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the ONWARDS 1, 2 and 4 trials
Abstract
Aim: To explore the efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) in Japanese adults (≥20 years old) with type 2 diabetes from the global ONWARDS 1, 2 and 4 trials.
Materials and methods: Insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) individuals were randomized to icodec or a once-daily insulin comparator: insulin glargine U100 [ONWARDS 1 (basal insulin only) and 4 (basal-bolus regimen)] or insulin degludec [ONWARDS 2 (basal insulin only)]. The primary outcome was change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) (ONWARDS 1: Week 52; ONWARDS 2 and 4: Week 26). Here, we present the Japanese subgroup results.
Results: Similar reductions in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to EOT were observed in each trial for icodec and comparators. The proportion of time in range (blood glucose 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) at EOT was also comparable across treatment groups (time in range: 58%-68%), as was time spent with blood glucose below 3.0 mmol/L (<1.0%). Combined clinically significant (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L) or severe (requiring external assistance for recovery) hypoglycaemia rates were low, with no severe events (ONWARDS 1 and 2) or a single severe event (ONWARDS 4; icodec group) reported. These results generally aligned with findings from the respective global populations. No new safety issues were identified.
Conclusions: Icodec improved glycaemic control to a similar degree as once-daily basal insulin comparators while maintaining low levels of clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia. The findings support icodec use in Japanese individuals with different levels of type 2 diabetes progression.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04880850 NCT04770532 NCT04460885.
Keywords: basal insulin; clinical trial; insulin therapy; type 2 diabetes.
© 2024 Novo Nordisk and The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kjeldsen TB, Hubálek F, Hjørringgaard CU, et al. Molecular engineering of insulin icodec, the first acylated insulin analog for once‐weekly administration in humans. J Med Chem. 2021;64(13):8942‐8950.
-
- Nishimura E, Pridal L, Glendorf T, et al. Molecular and pharmacological characterization of insulin icodec: a new basal insulin analog designed for once‐weekly dosing. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021;9(1):e002301.
-
- Mathieu C, Ásbjörnsdóttir B, Bajaj HS, et al. Switching to once‐weekly insulin icodec versus once‐daily insulin glargine U100 in individuals with basal‐bolus insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 4): a phase 3a, randomised, open‐label, multicentre, treat‐to‐target, non‐inferiority trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10392):1929‐1940.
-
- Philis‐Tsimikas A, Asong M, Franek E, et al. Switching to once‐weekly insulin icodec versus once‐daily insulin degludec in individuals with basal insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 2): a phase 3a, randomised, open label, multicentre, treat‐to‐target trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(6):414‐425.
-
- Rosenstock J, Bain SC, Gowda A, et al. Weekly icodec versus daily glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes without previous insulin. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(4):297‐308.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical