Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 31;134(7):1139-1150.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae167.

Untangling poikilohydry and desiccation tolerance: evolutionary and macroecological drivers in ferns

Affiliations

Untangling poikilohydry and desiccation tolerance: evolutionary and macroecological drivers in ferns

Daniela Aros-Mualin et al. Ann Bot. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Poikilohydry describes the inability of plants to internally regulate their water content (hydroregulation), whereas desiccation tolerance (DT) refers to the ability to restore normal metabolic functions upon rehydration. The failure to clearly separate these two adaptations has impeded a comprehensive understanding of their unique evolutionary and ecological drivers. Unlike bryophytes and angiosperms, these adaptations in ferns are sometimes uncorrelated, offering a unique opportunity to navigate their intricate interplay.

Methods: We classified ferns into two syndromes: the Hymenophyllum-type (H-type), encompassing species with filmy leaves lacking stomata that experience extreme poikilohydry and varying degrees of DT, and the Pleopeltis-type (P-type), consisting of resurrection plants with variable hydroregulation but high DT.

Key results: The H-type evolved during globally cool Icehouse periods, as an adaptation to low light levels in damp, shady habitats, and currently prevails in wet environments. Conversely, the P-type evolved predominantly under Greenhouse periods as an adaptation to periodic water shortage, with most extant species thriving in warm, seasonally dry habitats.

Conclusions: Out study underscores the fundamental differences between poikilohydry and DT, emphasizing the imperative to meticulously differentiate and qualify the strength of each strategy as well as their interactions, as a basis for understanding the genetic and evolutionary background of these ecologically crucial adaptations.

Keywords: Abiotic stress; dehydration; drought; homoiohydry; resurrection plants; water loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alejo-Jacuinde G, Herrera-Estrella L.. 2022. Exploring the high variability of vegetative desiccation tolerance in Pteridophytes. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 11: 1222. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alpert P, Oliver MJ.. 2002. Drying without dying In: Pritchard HW, Black M, eds. Desiccation and survival in plants: drying without dying. Wallingford: CABI Pub., 3–43.
    1. Arakaki M, Christin P-A, Nyffeler R, et al.2011. Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world’s major succulent plant lineages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 8379–8384. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartoń K. 2024. MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.48.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
    1. Beaulieu JM, O’Meara BC, Donoghue MJ.. 2013. Identifying hidden rate changes in the evolution of a binary morphological character: The evolution of plant habit in Campanulid angiosperms. Systematic Biology 62: 725–737. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources