The Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework: An Innovative and Rigorous Set of Methods to Evaluate Integrated Care Programs
- PMID: 39345820
- PMCID: PMC11428653
- DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7715
The Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework: An Innovative and Rigorous Set of Methods to Evaluate Integrated Care Programs
Abstract
Introduction: Integrated care programs that prioritize comprehensive service delivery for behavioural health and medical conditions have the potential to improve patient outcomes. Few programs, however, use data-driven methods to guide program evaluation and implementation, limiting their effectiveness, as well as the scope of findings in the research literature.
Purpose: To address these gaps, we describe an innovative and rigorous evaluative research framework: the Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework, designed to be tailorable across conditions and care settings.
Method: The RICE Research Framework is guided by two core concepts: (1) an approach built on engaging as equal partners and (2) data source triangulation. For the former, the approach relies on multiple teams (Project, Clinical Site, Evaluation, and Consumer) working in collaboration. While teams have specific roles, all teams engage frequently as equal partners to facilitate performance and advance research deliverables. For the latter, we provide a template with recommended primary and secondary data sources with areas of focus, applicable methods, and samples. These sources, when used in combination, can guide implementation, advance replicability, develop/refine health care programs, and foster dissemination of scientific findings.
Conclusions: We recommend clinicians and scientists implement the RICE Research Framework to enhance their integrated care programs.
Keywords: behavioural health; evaluation; integrated care; medical; methodology; research.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
All authors are free from significant competing interests relevant to the subject being commented upon.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277. Oncologist. 1999. PMID: 10545862
-
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37830206 Review.
-
Clinical, operational, and financial evaluation practices in integrated behavioral health care.Fam Syst Health. 2022 Sep;40(3):312-321. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000683. Epub 2022 May 12. Fam Syst Health. 2022. PMID: 35549490 Review.
References
-
- Coventry PA, Hudson JL, Kontopantelis E, Archer J, Richards DA, Gilbody S, et al. Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9): e108114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108114 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources