Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 23;24(3):22.
doi: 10.5334/ijic.7715. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.

The Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework: An Innovative and Rigorous Set of Methods to Evaluate Integrated Care Programs

Affiliations

The Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework: An Innovative and Rigorous Set of Methods to Evaluate Integrated Care Programs

Jamey J Lister et al. Int J Integr Care. .

Abstract

Introduction: Integrated care programs that prioritize comprehensive service delivery for behavioural health and medical conditions have the potential to improve patient outcomes. Few programs, however, use data-driven methods to guide program evaluation and implementation, limiting their effectiveness, as well as the scope of findings in the research literature.

Purpose: To address these gaps, we describe an innovative and rigorous evaluative research framework: the Rutgers Integrated Care Evaluation (RICE) Research Framework, designed to be tailorable across conditions and care settings.

Method: The RICE Research Framework is guided by two core concepts: (1) an approach built on engaging as equal partners and (2) data source triangulation. For the former, the approach relies on multiple teams (Project, Clinical Site, Evaluation, and Consumer) working in collaboration. While teams have specific roles, all teams engage frequently as equal partners to facilitate performance and advance research deliverables. For the latter, we provide a template with recommended primary and secondary data sources with areas of focus, applicable methods, and samples. These sources, when used in combination, can guide implementation, advance replicability, develop/refine health care programs, and foster dissemination of scientific findings.

Conclusions: We recommend clinicians and scientists implement the RICE Research Framework to enhance their integrated care programs.

Keywords: behavioural health; evaluation; integrated care; medical; methodology; research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors are free from significant competing interests relevant to the subject being commented upon.

Figures

An infographic of The RICE Research Framework’s Engaging as Equal Partners Approach
Figure 1
The RICE Research Framework: Engaging as Equal Partners Approach.

Similar articles

References

    1. Coventry PA, Hudson JL, Kontopantelis E, Archer J, Richards DA, Gilbody S, et al. Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9): e108114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108114 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maciosek MV, LaFrance AB, Dehmer SP, McGree DA, Flottemesch TJ, Xu Z, et al. Updated priorities among effective clinical preventive services. Ann Fam Med. 2017; 15(1): 14–22. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martínez-González NA, Berchtold P, Ullman K, Busato A, Egger M. Integrated care programmes for adults with chronic conditions: A meta-review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014; 26(5): 561–70. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu071 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiss L, Quint E, Leto C, Vaughn I, Redrovan A, Fernandes M, et al. Evaluation of an integrated health promotion program for a low-income urban population: Findings and lessons learned. Public Health Nurs. 2020; 38(4): 571–78. DOI: 10.1111/phn.12839 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolfe I, Satherley R-M, Scotney E, Newham J, Lingam R. Integrated care models and child health: A meta-analysis. Pediatr. 2020; 145(1): e20183747. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-3747 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources