Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 24:17:6691-6706.
doi: 10.2147/JIR.S474329. eCollection 2024.

Qing-Luo-Yin Eased Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis by Inhibiting SIRT1-Controlled Visfatin Production in White Adipose Tissues

Affiliations

Qing-Luo-Yin Eased Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis by Inhibiting SIRT1-Controlled Visfatin Production in White Adipose Tissues

Dan-Dan Wang et al. J Inflamm Res. .

Abstract

Background: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent deacetylase SIRT1 regulates both metabolism and immune functions. This study investigated if SIRT1 inhibitory property of herbal formula Qing-Luo-Yin (QLY) contributed to its anti-rheumatic effects.

Methods: Adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) rats were treated by QLY and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN, a biosynthesis precursor of NAD) for 38 days. After sacrifice, blood, paws, liver and white adipose tissues (WAT) were collected. Pre-adipocytes were cultured by the rats' serum. The medium was used for monocytes culture. Some pre-adipocytes were treated by QLY-derived SIRT1 inhibitors. SIRT1 was silenced or overexpressed beforehand. The samples were subjected to kits-based quantification, polymerase-chain reaction, western-blot, immunofluorescence, and histology experiments.

Results: AIA rats experienced significant fat loss in liver and WAT. Expression of many SIRT1-related signals like PPARγ, PGC-1α, HSL, ATGL and CPT-1A were altered. QLY attenuated all these abnormalities and joint injuries. By pan-acetylation up-regulation, visfatin was obviously reduced in QLY-treated AIA rats' blood (from 191.8 to 127.0 pg/mL). NMN sustained SIRT1 activation by replenishing NAD, and weakened these effects. QLY-containing serum and the related compounds showed similar impacts on pre-adipocytes, resembling the changes in QLY-treated AIA rats' WAT. These treatments suppressed AIA serum-induced visfatin secretion (from 49.3 to 36.1 and 30.7 pg/mL). This effect was impaired by SIRT1 overexpression. The medium from the compounds-treated pre-adipocytes impaired NF-κB activation in AIA serum-cultured monocytes.

Conclusion: Besides fat depletion, SIRT1 up-regulation in rheumatic subjects' WAT promotes visfatin production, and exacerbates inflammation. SIRT1 inhibition in WAT is an anti-rheumatic way of QLY independent of immune regulation.

Keywords: PPARγ; Traditional Chinese Medicine; adipocyte; rheumatoid arthritis; visfatin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
QLY therapy improved arthritic manifestations of AIA rats. (A) AIA progression evaluated based on arthritis scores; (B) relative weight of left hind paw; (C) expression of some polarization-related genes in blood monocytes; (D) levels of some RA-related cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17A and MCP-1) in rats’ blood; (E) levels of oxidative indicators (GSH, MDA and SOD) in rats’ blood; (F) AKP levels in rats’ blood; (G) levels of TNF-α and RF detected in rats’ joints; (H) morphological observation and H&E staining-based histological examination of left hind ankle joint; the red and blue arrows indicate cartilage erosion and synovial invasion, respectively. All the data are presented in mean±SD. Statistical significance: *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with AIA models; #p < 0.05 compared with QLY-treated AIA rats.
Figure 2
Figure 2
QLY therapy affected SIRT1-related signals as well as metabolic status in AIA rats’ liver. (A) levels of metabolism indicators in rats’ blood; (B) levels of GLU and TG in rats’ livers; (C) Oil Red O staining-based histological examination of livers; (D) WB assay performed using liver samples; (E) the quantification results of assay (D). All the data are presented in mean±SD. Statistical significance: *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with AIA models; #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 compared with QLY-treated AIA rats.
Figure 3
Figure 3
QLY therapy reshaped both metabolism and secretion of WAT in AIA rats by regulating SIRT1-related signals. (A) morphological observation of representative perirenal fat pads; (B) relative weight of perirenal fat pads; (C) H&E staining-based histological examination of perirenal fat pads; (D) WB and IP assays performed using rats’ WAT samples; (E) the quantification results of assay (D); (F) levels of representative adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, and visfatin) in rats’ blood; (G and H) TG and visfatin detected in rats’ WAT; (I) expression of pan-acetylated proteins and visfatin in rats’ WAT. All the data are presented in mean±SD. Statistical significance: *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with AIA models; #p < 0.05 compared with QLY-treated AIA rats.
Figure 4
Figure 4
QLY-containing serum affected immune status of monocytes indirectly via pre-adipocytes. (A) WB assays performed using the rat pre-adipocytes, which were cultured with the serums from healthy, AIA model or QLY-treated AIA rats; (B) the quantification results of assay (A); (C) levels of some key metabolites (GLU, TG and LA) in the medium from assay (A); (D) levels of IL-6, TNF-α and visfatin in the medium from assay (A); (E) levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α secreted by the monocytes cultured by the mediums from assay (A); (F) levels of IL-1β secreted by the monocytes cultured by the supernatants of different rats’ WAT homogenates. All the data are presented in mean±SD. Statistical significance: *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with AIA group.
Figure 5
Figure 5
QLY-related SIRT1 inhibitors exerted the similar effects on pre-adipocytes to QLY-containing serum. (A) WB assays performed on the rat pre-adipocytes, which were cultured by healthy, AIA model rats’ serums and then treated by the compounds or QLY-containing serum; (B) the quantification results of assay (A); (C) levels of some key metabolites (GLU, TG and LA) in the medium above; (D) levels of representative adipokines and cytokines (leptin, adiponectin, visfatin, IL-1β, IL-6 and MCP-1) in the medium; (E) levels of visfatin secreted by the 3T3-L1 cells, which received the same treatments as above; (F) expression of pan-acetylated proteins and visfatin in the cells from assay E. All the data are presented in mean±SD. Statistical significance: *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with AIA group.
Figure 6
Figure 6
QLY-induced visfatin decrease in pre-adipocytes was attributed to SIRT1 inhibition. (A) WB assays performed using the pre-adipocytes cultured in vitro; SIRT1 in some of them were overexpressed, a portion of which were exposed to QLY-related SIRT1 inhibitors; (B) the quantification results of assay (A); (C) levels of some key metabolites (GLU, TG and LA) in the medium from assay (A); (D) levels of representative WAT-released substances (visfatin, IL-6 and MCP-1) in the medium; (E), WB assays performed using the pre-adipocytes cultured in vitro; SIRT1 in some of them were silenced, a portion of which exposed to QLY-related SIRT1 inhibitors; (F) the quantification results of assay (E); (G) levels of WAT-released substances in the medium from assay (E); (H) expression and localization of visfatin and p65 in the THP-1 cells stimulated by some mediums from assay (A); the yellow and green arrows indicate p65 distribution in the cytoplasm of normal cells and visfatin-induced p65 aggregation in the nuclear of AIA serum-cultured cells, respectively. All the data are presented in mean±SD. Statistical significance: *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared with AIA group; ##p < 0.01 compared with compounds group.

References

    1. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(23):2205–2219. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1004965 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ding Q, Hu W, Wang R, et al. Signaling pathways in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for targeted therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts CA, Dickinson AK, Taams LS. The interplay between monocytes/macrophages and CD4+ T cell subsets in rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol. 2015;6:571. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00571 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davignon JL, Hayder M, Baron M, et al. Targeting monocytes/macrophages in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2013;52(4):590–598. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kes304 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tu J, Huang W, Zhang W, Mei J, Zhu C. A tale of two immune cells in rheumatoid arthritis: the crosstalk between macrophages and T cells in the synovium. Front Immunol. 2021;12:655477. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.655477 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources