Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Sep 25:12:e18139.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.18139. eCollection 2024.

Comparative postoperative prognosis of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Tingyu Wu  1 , Yaping Jiang  2 , Weipeng Shi  1 , Yingzhen Wang  1 , Tao Li  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparative postoperative prognosis of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Tingyu Wu et al. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes between ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearing surfaces in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) through a pooled analysis and evidence update.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to March 2023 for studies that compared the bearing surfaces of CoC and CoP in patients undergoing THA. The primary outcomes were the incidence of common postoperative complications and the rate of postoperative revision. The secondary outcome was the Harris Hip Score.

Results: A total of 10 eligible studies involving 1,946 patients (1.192 CoC-THA versus 906 CoP-THA) were included in the evidence synthesis. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in the rates of common postoperative complications (dislocation, deep vein thrombosis, infection, wear debris or osteolysis) and of revision. After eliminating heterogeneity, the postoperative Harris Hip Score was higher in the CoC group than in the CoP group. However, the strength of evidence was moderate for the Harris Hip Score.

Conclusion: CoC articulations are more commonly used in younger, healthier, and more active patients. While the performance of conventional polyethylene is indeed inferior to highly cross-linked polyethylene, there is currently a lack of sufficient research comparing the outcomes between highly cross-linked polyethylene and CoC bearing surfaces. This area should be a focal point for future research, and it is hoped that more relevant articles will emerge. Given the limited number of studies included, the heterogeneity and potential bias of those included in the analysis, orthopaedic surgeons should select a THA material based on their experience and patient-specific factors, and large multicentre clinical trials with >15 years of follow-up are needed to provide more evidence on the optimal bearing surface for initial THA.

Keywords: Ceramic-on-ceramic; Ceramic-on-polyethylene; Complications; Harris hip score; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of the systematic search and selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Quality assessment of risk of bias summary in included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Risk of bias graph.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Forest plots of postoperative complication outcomes: (A) dislocation rate, (B) deep venous thrombosis rate, (C) infection rate, (D) wear debris or osteolysis rate.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Forest plots of revision surgery outcomes.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Forest plots of postoperative Harris hip score.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Sensitivity analysis of postoperative Harris Hip Score.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Forest plots of postoperative Harris Hip Score after excluding one study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Almaawi A, Alzuhair A, AlHakbani A, Benfaris D, Al-Abdullatif F, Alabdulkarim NH, Awwad W. Comparison of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene in primary total hip arthroplasty: findings of a meta-analysis. Cureus. 2021;13:e13304. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13304. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amanatullah DF, Landa J, Strauss EJ, Garino JP, Kim SH, Di Cesare PE. Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2011;26(6 Suppl):72–77. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atrey A, Wolfstadt JI, Hussain N, Khoshbin A, Ward S, Shahid M, Schemitsch EH, Waddell JP. The ideal total hip replacement bearing surface in the young patient: a prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene: 15-year follow-up. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018;33:1752–1756. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.066. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bader R, Steinhauser E, Zimmermann S, Mittelmeier W, Scholz R, Busch R. Differences between the wear couples metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic in the stability against dislocation of total hip replacement. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2004;15(6):711–718. doi: 10.1023/b:jmsm.0000030214.79180.13. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bal BS, Aleto TJ, Garino JP, Toni A, Hendricks KJ. Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: results of a multicenter prospective randomized study and update of modern ceramic total hip trials in the USA. 10th International BIOLOX Symposium; 2005 2005 Jun 10-11; Washington, DC.2005. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources