Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2928-S2931.
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1280_23. Epub 2024 Mar 5.

Evaluation of the Training Program on Participatory Rural Appraisal Methods Targeting Undergraduate Medical Students from the First Professional Phase

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Training Program on Participatory Rural Appraisal Methods Targeting Undergraduate Medical Students from the First Professional Phase

Saurabh RamBihariLal Shrivastava et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Participatory rural appraisal (PRA) methods have been acknowledged as important tools to involve members of the community in the process of identification of their problems, the factors contributing to the development of these problems, and ways by which these problems can be resolved.

Materials and methods: A quasi-experimental study will be conducted in two stages among first professional phase medical students. In the first stage, these students will be trained on PRA methods by the trained teachers, while in the second stage, these students will implement PRA methods in the local community. The entire training process and its different components will be evaluated using validated study tools (semi-structured questionnaire), which will be administered using Google Forms. The statistical analysis will be performed using frequency and percentages, and a paired t-test will be used to compare the change in knowledge before and after training.

Conclusion: In conclusion, first professional phase medical students must be trained in PRA methods and subsequently supervised to monitor their change in behavior. However, as the success of the entire program will depend on the quality of training imparted to medical students, the training program must be evaluated from the perspective of students, community, and teachers.

Keywords: Community; medical students; participatory rural appraisal; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Research pathway

Similar articles

References

    1. Chakrabarti R, Wardle K, Wright T, Bennie T, Gishen F. Approaching an undergraduate medical curriculum map: Challenges and expectations. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:341. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramanathan R, Shanmugam J, Gopalakrishnan SM, Palanisamy KT, Narayanan S. Challenges in the implementation of competency-based medical curriculum: Perspectives of prospective academicians. Cureus. 2022;14:e32838. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitra J, Saha I. Attitude and communication module in medical curriculum: Rationality and challenges. Indian J Public Health. 2016;60:95–8. - PubMed
    1. Schrewe B, Ellaway RH, Watling C, Bates J. The contextual curriculum: Learning in the matrix, learning from the matrix. Acad Med. 2018;93:1645–51. - PubMed
    1. Mahmood MA, Khan KS, Kadir MM, Barney N, Ali S, Tunio R. Utility of participatory rural appraisal for health needs assessment and planning. J Pak Med Assoc. 2002;52:296–300. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources