Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 29;16(8):e68153.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.68153. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Breastfeeding Success With Use of Electric Breast Pump Versus Inverted Syringe Technique in Lactating Women With Inverted Nipple: Open Labelled Randomized Control Trial

Affiliations

Breastfeeding Success With Use of Electric Breast Pump Versus Inverted Syringe Technique in Lactating Women With Inverted Nipple: Open Labelled Randomized Control Trial

Bhabesh K Chowdhry et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Inverted nipple is a commonly encountered impediment to proper attachment and latch establishment. Correction of inversion using a disposable syringe represents the conventional method of management. However, it is understudied, cumbersome, and inconvenient. Using electric breast pump represents a more physiological method to achieve correction of inversion. This open-label, randomized control trial investigated syringing versus electric breast pump both in terms of effectiveness in achieving correction of inversion of nipple and patient satisfaction with the use of the assigned intervention. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to compare breastfeeding success by Day 3 postnatal age (achieving correction of inversion of nipple and establishment of direct breastfeeding) in syringing versus electric breast pump in mothers with inverted or flat nipples. The secondary objective was to compare the two methods for the pain experienced by the mother while using syringing versus an electric breast pump. Methodology/Design This was a single-center, open-label randomized control trial performed at a tertiary care neonatal unit in Eastern India, from December 2022 to September 2023. 60 healthy mothers with inverted nipples were randomly allocated to one of two interventions: Group A (n=30, syringing); or Group B (n=30, electric breast pump). Both groups were compared for the establishment of breastfeeding by Day 3 postnatal age and daily maximum pain scores till Day 3 (visual analogue scale). Multivariable logistic regression was used to look for factors independently associated with establishment of breast feeding by Day 3 postnatal period. Chi square test was used to compare the proportions of different outcomes between the groups. Results The primary outcome of establishment of breastfeeding by Day 3 postnatal period was achieved in 18 (60%) mothers in syringe group vs. 17 (56.67%) in the breast pump group, with no statistically significant difference (p=0.793). In the first two days the pain score differences were not statistically significant, but on Day 3, 28 (93.99%) mothers in the electric breast pump group had no/mild pain compared to 22 (73.33%) mothers in the syringe usage group. This difference was statistically significant (p= 0.038). Conclusion In hospital settings where electric breast pump is easily available, the same may be preferred over inverted syringe technique for achieving establishment of breastfeeding by Day 3 postnatal period with minimal nipple pain in mothers. However, further large scale studies will be required to confirm these findings.

Keywords: breastfeeding women; electric breast pump; inverted nipple; nipple pain; syringing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institute Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna issued approval AIIMS/Pat/IEC/2022/956. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Interventions performed for inverted nipple in comparison groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Study flow diagram
Figure 3
Figure 3. Vioplot of pain scores from Day 1 to Day 3 postnatal period in Group A vs. Group B

Similar articles

References

    1. Breastfeeding and post-perinatal infant deaths in the United States, a national prospective cohort analysis. Li R, Ware J, Chen A, et al. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022;5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. The prevalence of congenital inverted nipple. Park HS, Yoon CH, Kim HJ. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;23:144–146. - PubMed
    1. Inversion of the human female nipple, with a simple method of treatment. Schwager RG, Smith JW, Gray GF, Goulian D Jr. https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/citation/1974/11000/Inversion_of_.... Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;54:564–569. - PubMed
    1. Breastfeeding success with the use of the inverted syringe technique for management of inverted nipples in lactating women: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Nabulsi M, Ghanem R, Abou-Jaoude M, Khalil A. Trials. 2019;20:737. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The inverted nipple: its grading and surgical correction. Han S, Hong YG. https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/abstract/1999/08000/The_Inverted_.... Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:389–395. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources