Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Dec 10;8(23):6114-6126.
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013254.

OUTREACH: phase 2 study of lisocabtagene maraleucel as outpatient or inpatient treatment at community sites for R/R LBCL

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

OUTREACH: phase 2 study of lisocabtagene maraleucel as outpatient or inpatient treatment at community sites for R/R LBCL

Yuliya Linhares et al. Blood Adv. .

Abstract

Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) is an autologous, CD19-directed, 4-1BB chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). We present the OUTREACH primary analysis, evaluating the safety and efficacy of outpatient monitoring after liso-cel treatment at community sites in the United States. Adults with R/R LBCL after ≥2 prior lines of therapy received liso-cel. Outpatient vs inpatient monitoring was per investigator discretion. The primary end points were incidences of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurological events (NEs), prolonged cytopenia, and infections. Efficacy was a secondary end point. Eighty-two patients received liso-cel (outpatient monitored, 70%; inpatient monitored, 30%). The median follow-up was 10.6 months (range, 1.0-24.5). In outpatients and inpatients, grade ≥3 CRS occurred in 0% and 0%, NEs in 12% and 4%, infections in 12% and 8%, and prolonged cytopenia in 33% and 32%, respectively. Among outpatients, 25% were never hospitalized after infusion, and 32% were hospitalized ≤72 hours after the day of infusion; the median time to hospitalization was 5.0 days (range, 2-310). The median initial hospitalization duration after liso-cel was 6.0 days (range, 1-28) for outpatients and 15.0 days (range, 3-31) for inpatients. Objective response rate was 80%, complete response rate was 54%, and the median duration of response was 14.75 months (95% confidence interval, 5.0 to not reached). OUTREACH is, to our knowledge, the first and largest study to prospectively assess CAR T-cell therapy with outpatient monitoring in community-based medical centers. Liso-cel demonstrated meaningful efficacy with favorable safety in patients with R/R LBCL. Data support the feasibility of liso-cel administration at community sites with outpatient monitoring. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03744676.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: Y.L. declares honoraria from Kyowa Kirin; speaker's bureau fees from Kyowa Kirin; advisory board fees from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, BeiGene USA Inc, Gilead Sciences Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, Seagen Inc, and TG Therapeutics; and research funding from ADC Therapeutics, BeiGene USA Inc, Genentech, and Seagen Inc. M.C. reports advisory board fees from Bristol Myers Squibb. J.C.V. declares consultancy and advisory boards fees from and equity in NexImmune; and speaker's bureau fees from Kite/Gilead. J.E. declares speakers’ bureau fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Gilead. H.Y. declares employment with Texas Oncology; consultancy fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Karyopharm; speakers’ bureau fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Takeda; travel, accommodations, and expenses from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, and Karyopharm Therapeutics; divested equity in Epizyme and Karyopharm Therapeutics; and research funding from BeiGene, Janssen, and Takeda. J.P.S. declares consultancy fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, TG Therapeutics, Merck, and Lilly. A.K. declares previous employment with and equity in Bristol Myers Squibb. M.V., K.O., A.A., R.E., and B.Y. declare employment with and equity in Bristol Myers Squibb. B.M. declares speakers’ bureau fees from Gilead and Takeda. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

The current affiliation for A.K. is Arcellx, Inc., Redwood City, CA.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Outpatient requirements in OUTREACH. (A) Outpatient CAR T-cell treatment. Patients were considered to be monitored as outpatients if liso-cel was administered in the outpatient facility or in the inpatient facility with subsequent discharge the same day at the end of the observation period. (B) Site and patient requirements.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
CONSORT diagram (intention-to-treat set). ∗Screen failures due to not meeting eligibility criteria included not having an eligible R/R LBCL histology (n = 6), social/familial/geographical conditions (n = 5), not having PET-positive disease (n = 3), not signing the informed consent form before study procedures (n = 1), not having adequate cardiac function (n = 1), history of cardiovascular condition (n = 1), and receipt of radiation within 6 weeks of leukapheresis (n = 1). †One patient did not meet 2 eligibility criteria (ECOG PS of 0-1 and inadequate renal function). ‡NCP was defined as any CAR T-cell product wherein one of the CD8 or CD4 cell components did not meet 1 of the requirements to be considered liso-cel but could be considered appropriate for infusion. The patient who received NCP (CD8 component was out of specifications) was not included in the safety/efficacy analysis. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; NCP, nonconforming product; PD, progressive disease; PI, principal investigator.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
DOR, PFS, and OS (liso-cel–treated set). (A-C) Kaplan-Meier estimates of DOR (A), PFS (B), and OS (C). ∗Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain 2-sided 95% CIs. †Reverse Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain median follow-up and its 95% CIs.

References

    1. Morrison VA, Bell JA, Hamilton L, et al. Economic burden of patients with diffuse large B-cell and follicular lymphoma treated in the USA. Future Oncol. 2018;14(25):2627–2642. - PubMed
    1. Gatwood KS, Dholaria BR, Lucena M, Baer B, Savani BN, Oluwole OO. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: challenges and framework of outpatient administration. EJHaem. 2022;3(suppl 1):54–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alexander M, Culos K, Roddy J, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: a comprehensive review of clinical efficacy, toxicity, and best practices for outpatient administration. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27(7):558–570. - PubMed
    1. Myers GD, Verneris MR, Goy A, Maziarz RT. Perspectives on outpatient administration of CAR-T cell therapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(4) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spanjaart AM, Pennings ERA, Kos M, et al. Development of a core set of patient- and caregiver-reported signs and symptoms to facilitate early recognition of acute chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy toxicities. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023;19(3):e407–e416. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data