Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 30:10:e58358.
doi: 10.2196/58358.

AI Governance: A Challenge for Public Health

Affiliations

AI Governance: A Challenge for Public Health

Jennifer K Wagner et al. JMIR Public Health Surveill. .

Abstract

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is structuralizing social, political, and economic determinants of health into the invisible algorithms that shape all facets of modern life. Nevertheless, AI holds immense potential as a public health tool, enabling beneficial objectives such as precision public health and medicine. Developing an AI governance framework that can maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of AI is a significant challenge. The benefits of public health engagement in AI governance could be extensive. Here, we describe how several public health concepts can enhance AI governance. Specifically, we explain how (1) harm reduction can provide a framework for navigating the governance debate between traditional regulation and "soft law" approaches; (2) a public health understanding of social determinants of health is crucial to optimally weigh the potential risks and benefits of AI; (3) public health ethics provides a toolset for guiding governance decisions where individual interests intersect with collective interests; and (4) a One Health approach can improve AI governance effectiveness while advancing public health outcomes. Public health theories, perspectives, and innovations could substantially enrich and improve AI governance, creating a more equitable and socially beneficial path for AI development.

Keywords: AI; AI governance; artificial intelligence; engagement; harm reduction; invisible algorithms; legislation and jurisprudence; modern life; one health; public health; social determinants of health; soft law; traditional regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tabassi E. Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) [10-09-2024];2023 http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.100-1.pdf URL. Accessed.
    1. Braghieri L, Levy R, Makarin A. Social media and mental health. Am Econ Rev. 2022 Nov 1;112(11):3660–3693. doi: 10.1257/aer.20211218. doi. - DOI
    1. Luby J, Kertz S. Increasing suicide rates in early adolescent girls in the United States and the equalization of sex disparity in suicide: the need to investigate the role of social media. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193916. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3916. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelly Y, Zilanawala A, Booker C, Sacker A. Social media use and adolescent mental health: findings from the UK millennium cohort study. EClinMed. 2018 Dec;6:59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.005. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Neil C. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing Group; 2016. [05-09-2024]. p. 272.https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3002861 URL. Accessed. - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources