Key Considerations in Integrating a Peer Support Model Within Psychiatric Emergency Services at a Canadian Pediatric Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study
- PMID: 39347849
- DOI: 10.1007/s10597-024-01365-5
Key Considerations in Integrating a Peer Support Model Within Psychiatric Emergency Services at a Canadian Pediatric Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Difficulties accessing primary care and community-based mental health supports has contributed to youth (aged < 18 years) with mental health concerns presenting to Emergency Departments (EDs). Peer support services in community-based mental health settings are associated with improved outcomes; research exploring this in pediatric EDs is lacking. Determine feasibility and acceptability of integrating peer support services into a pediatric ED. 13 peer support workers (PSWs) and 30 mental health providers and stakeholders participated in interviews or focus groups. Using codebook thematic analysis, recommendations for integration were identified. Key recommendations were: clear conceptualization of youth and family peer support, effective communication pathways between the multidisciplinary team and PSWs, provision of training for ED staff to ensure workplace readiness for peer support, and consistent support for PSWs. Integration of peer support into pediatric EDs offers a feasible and acceptable way to support youth experiencing mental health crises.
Keywords: Emergency department; Mental health; Pediatrics; Peer support; Youth.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Ethics Approval and Informed Consent: All the procedures were followed in accordance with the relevant guidelines (e.g. Declaration of Helsinki). This study was approved by the University of Calgary’s Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (CHREB) (REB#18-552). All participants provided informed consent to prior to participating in the study.
References
-
- Ali, K., Farrer, L., Gulliver, A., & Griffiths, K. M. (2015). Online peer-to-peer support for young people with mental health problems: A systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 2(2), e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.4418.eCollection
-
- Bradshaw, C., Atkins, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
-
- Brasier, C., Roennfeldt, H., Hamilton, B. E., Martel, A., Hill, N., Stratford, A., et al. (2021). Peer support work for people experiencing mental distress attending the emergency department: Exploring the potential. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 34, 13848. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723 - DOI
-
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Campbell, L. A., Lovas, D., Withers, E., & Peacock, K. (2020). Opening the door: inviting youth and parent perspectives on youth mental health emergency department use. Research Involvement and Engagement 6(26). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00204-7
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
