Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;15(11):2401-2416.
doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01649-9. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

Comparison of the Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy Between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japan: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data

Affiliations

Comparison of the Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy Between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japan: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data

Masaya Koshizaka et al. Diabetes Ther. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a microvascular complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is a leading cause of blindness and has detrimental effects on patients' quality of life. We compared the risk of DR diagnosis with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in patients with T2DM in Japan.

Methods: This Japanese retrospective cohort study used the JMDC Claims Database (data collected from January 2015 to September 2022). Patients with T2DM and no record of microvascular or macrovascular diseases who were newly treated with an SGLT2i (23,061 patients) or a DPP-4i (53,986 patients) were matched 1:1 using propensity score (10,166 per matched group). Incidence rates (IRs) and cumulative IRs of DR diagnosis were calculated for each treatment group; hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models to compare the risk between the groups.

Results: The IR of DR diagnosis was 46.23 and 57.12 per 1000 person-years in the SGLT2i and DPP-4i groups, respectively, with a significantly lower risk in the SGLT2i group than in the DPP-4i group (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.92, P = 0.0003).

Conclusions: In this study, the risk of DR diagnosis was lower with SGLT2i compared with DPP-4i in patients with T2DM without microvascular and macrovascular diseases in Japan. Findings suggest that early SGLT2i treatment may be beneficial in preventing DR development in early-stage T2DM. Graphical abstract available for this article.

Keywords: Claims database; Diabetic macular edema; Diabetic retinopathy; Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors; Early-stage type 2 diabetes mellitus; Propensity score matching; Real-world study; Retrospective cohort study; Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Masaya Koshizaka and Tomoaki Tatsumi do not have any conflicts of interest to declare. Fumiko Kiyonaga, Yoshinori Kosakai, and Mami Shintani-Tachi are employees of Astellas Pharma Inc. Yoko Yoshinaga is a former employee of Astellas Pharma Inc. and a current employee of Eli Lilly Japan K.K.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition. DPP-4i dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, ICD-10 international classification of diseases, tenth revision, SGLT2i sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, T1DM type 1 diabetes mellitus, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier curve of cumulative rate of DR preceded by ophthalmic examination (matched cohort). CI confidence interval, DPP-4i dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, DR diabetic retinopathy, HR hazard ratio, SGLT2i sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Subgroup analysis of cumulative rate of DR (matched cohort). HR shows the risk of DR diagnosis in the SGLT2i group versus the DPP-4i group. BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, DPP-4i dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, DR diabetic retinopathy, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c, HR hazard ratio, RAS renin-angiotensin system, SBP systolic blood pressure, SGLT2i sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor

Similar articles

References

    1. Yang Z, Tan TE, Shao Y, Wong TY, Li X. Classification of diabetic retinopathy: past, present and future. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:1079217. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan TE, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy: looking forward to 2030. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;13:1077669. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kawasaki R, Tanaka S, Tanaka S, Yamamoto T, Sone H, Ohashi Y, et al. Incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes: 8 year follow-up study of the Japan diabetes complications study (JDCS). Diabetologia. 2011;54(9):2288–94. - PubMed
    1. Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, Chee ML, Rim TH, Cheung N, et al. Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(11):1580–91. - PubMed
    1. Singh RP, Elman MJ, Singh SK, Fung AE, Stoilov I. Advances in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Complicat. 2019;33(12): 107417. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources