Construction of M2 macrophage-related gene signature for predicting prognosis and revealing different immunotherapy response in bladder cancer patients
- PMID: 39347941
- DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03698-9
Construction of M2 macrophage-related gene signature for predicting prognosis and revealing different immunotherapy response in bladder cancer patients
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer development is closely associated with the dynamic interaction and communication between M2 macrophages and tumor cells. However, specific biomarkers for targeting M2 macrophages in immunotherapy remain limited and require further investigation.
Methods: In this study, we identified key co-expressed genes in M2 macrophages and developed gene signatures to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in patients. Public database provided the bioinformatics data used in the analysis. We created and verified an M2 macrophage-related gene signature in these datasets using Lasso-Cox analysis.
Results: The predictive value and immunological functions of our risk model were examined in bladder cancer patients, and 158 genes were found to be significantly positively correlated with M2 macrophages. Moreover, we identified two molecular subgroups of bladder cancer with markedly different immunological profiles and clinical prognoses. The five key risk genes identified in this model were validated, including CALU, ECM1, LRP1, CYTL1, and CCDC102B, demonstrating the model can accurately predict prognosis and identify unique responses to immunotherapy in patients with bladder cancer.
Conclusions: In summary, we constructed and validated a five-gene signature related to M2 macrophages, which shows strong potential for forecasting bladder cancer prognosis and immunotherapy response.
Keywords: Bladder cancer; Gene signature; Immunotherapy response; M2 macrophage.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval: The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data. Informed consent: For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
References
-
- Li F, Zheng Z, Chen W, Li D, Zhang H, Zhu Y, et al. Regulation of cisplatin resistance in bladder cancer by epigenetic mechanisms. Drug Resist Update. 2023;68: 100938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2023.100938 . - DOI
-
- Feng D, Liu S, Tang Y, Yang Y, Wei W, Han P. Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52(7):1243–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02406-0 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Birtle AJ, Capoun O, Compérat EM, Dominguez-Escrig JL, et al. European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2023 update. Eur Urol. 2023;84(1):49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.013 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Feng D, Li D, Wu R, Han P. Scientific advancements in drug development and trials for urothelial carcinoma: insights from the 2023 ASCO-GU cancers symposium. Aging Dis. 2023;14(6):1953–7. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2023.0502 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Guo CC, Lee S, Lee JG, Chen H, Zaleski M, Choi W, et al. Molecular profile of bladder cancer progression to clinically aggressive subtypes. Nat Rev Urol. 2024;21(7):391–405. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00847-7 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous