Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;56(1):2409342.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2409342. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

Association between triglyceride glucose-body mass index and the staging of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Affiliations

Association between triglyceride glucose-body mass index and the staging of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Fan Zhang et al. Ann Med. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to thoroughly investigate the clinical value of triglyceride glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI) in patients diagnosed with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Specifically, we aimed to determine its association with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and the progression of liver fibrosis.

Methods: The study included 393 patients diagnosed with NAFLD after liver biopsy. The patients were divided into two distinct cohorts: a training cohort (N = 320) and a validation cohort (N = 73). The training cohort was further divided into four groups based on TyG-BMI quartiles. The clinical characteristics of the patients in each group were compared in detail, and the association between TyG-BMI and NASH, NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) ≥ 4, at-risk NASH, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was analyzed using multiple models. Additionally, we generated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate the predictive ability of TyG-BMI for NASH and fibrosis staging in patients with NAFLD.

Results: Patients with higher TyG-BMI values had a significantly higher prevalence of NASH, NAS ≥ 4, at-risk NASH, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis (all p < .05). TyG-BMI was an independent predictor of these diseases in both unadjusted and adjusted models (all p < .05). ROC curve analysis further revealed the excellent performance of TyG-BMI in predicting NASH, NAS ≥ 4, at-risk NASH, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis. The validation cohort yielded analogous results. Furthermore, we constructed three multivariate models of TyG-BMI in conjunction with elastography metrics, which demonstrated elevated diagnostic AUC values of 0.782, 0.792, 0.794, 0.785, 0.834, and 0.845, respectively.

Conclusion: This study confirms a significant association between insulin resistance and NAFLD, including at-risk NASH and fibrosis staging, as assessed using the TyG-BMI index. TyG-BMI and its associated multivariate models can be valuable noninvasive indicators for NAFLD diagnosis, risk stratification, and disease course monitoring.

Keywords: Triglyceride glucose-body mass index; liver fibrosis; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; receiver operating characteristic curve.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flowchart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of TyG-BMI for predicting NASH (A), NAS ≥ 4 (B), at-risk NASH (C), significant fibrosis (D), advanced fibrosis (E), and cirrhosis (F) in patients with NAFLD in the training cohort.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Sensitivity and specificity of TyG-BMI for predicting NASH (A), NAS ≥ 4 (B), at-risk NASH (C), significant fibrosis (D), advanced fibrosis (E), and cirrhosis (F) in patients with NAFLD. Individual plots were derived from all individual score cutoffs covering the range where sensitivity was 100% to where specificity was 100%, followed by smoothening of the graph to cover the dynamic range of scores for their intended uses.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of TyG-BMI for predicting NASH (A), NAS ≥ 4 (B), at-risk NASH (C), significant fibrosis (D), advanced fibrosis (E), and cirrhosis (F) in patients with NAFLD in the validation cohort.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. El-Kassas M, Cabezas J, Coz PI, et al. . Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: current global burden. Semin Liver Dis. 2022;42(3):401–412. doi: 10.1055/a-1862-9088. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, et al. . Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15(1):11–20. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le MH, Yeo YH, Li X, et al. . 2019 global NAFLD prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(12):2809–2817 e28. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, et al. . Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(4):643.e9–654.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanyal AJ, Van Natta ML, Clark J, et al. . Prospective study of outcomes in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(17):1559–1569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2029349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources