Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 30;22(1):425.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03640-4.

Associations of combined accelerated biological aging and genetic susceptibility with incident dementia: a prospective study in the UK Biobank

Affiliations

Associations of combined accelerated biological aging and genetic susceptibility with incident dementia: a prospective study in the UK Biobank

Zirong Ye et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Accelerated biological aging has been verified to be a critical risk factor for a number of age-related diseases, but its role in dementia remained unclear. Whether it modified the effects of genetic factors was also unknown. This study evaluated the associations between accelerated biological aging and dementia and the moderating role of accelerated biological aging in the genetic susceptibility to the disease.

Methods: We included 200,731 participants in the UK biobank. Nine clinical blood biomarkers and chronological age were used to calculate Phenotypic age acceleration (PhenoAgeAccel), which is a novel indicator for accelerated biological aging. The associations of PhenoAgeAccel with dementia, both young-onset and late-onset dementia, were assessed by Cox proportional hazard models. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) alleles and polygenic risk scores (PRS) were used to evaluate the genetic risk of dementia. The interactions between genetic susceptibility and biological aging were tested on both multiplicative and additive scales.

Results: These findings showed individuals who were in the highest quartile of PhenoAgeAccel had a higher risk with incidence of dementia compared to individuals in the lowest quartile of PhenoAgeAccel (HR: 1.145 (95% CI: 1.050, 1.249)). Individuals with biologically older had a higher risk of dementia than individuals with biologically younger (HR: 1.069 (95% CI: 1.004, 1.138)). Furthermore, compared to individuals with biologically younger and low APOE ε4-related genetic risk, individuals with biologically younger and high APOE ε4-related genetic risk (HR:3.048 (95% CI: 2.811, 3.305)) had a higher risk of dementia than individuals with biologically older and high APOE ε4-related genetic risk (HR: 2.765 (95% CI: 2.523, 3.029)). Meanwhile, referring to low dementia PRS and biologically younger, the risk of dementia increased by 72.7% (HR: 1.727 (95% CI: 1.538, 1.939) in the biologically younger and high PRS group and 58.7% (HR: 1.587 (95% CI: 1.404, 1.793) in the biologically older and high PRS group, respectively. The negative interactions between PhenoAgeAccel with APOE ε4 and PRS were also tested on the additive scale.

Conclusions: Accelerated biological aging could bring the extra risk of dementia but attenuate the effects of genetic risk on dementia. These findings provide insights for precise prevention and intervention of dementia.

Keywords: Accelerated biological aging; Apolipoprotein E; Attributable proportion; Dementia; Polygenetic risk score; Relative excess risk; UK Biobank.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design and analysis process. Abbreviations: PhenoAgeAccel, phenotypic age acceleration; PRS, polygenic risk score
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Joint effects of the PhenoAgeAccel (by population quartiles) with the genetic risk on dementia risk. A The joint effects of the PhenoAgeAccel and APOE ε4-related genetic risk on the risk of dementia. B The joint effects of the PhenoAgeAccel and the PRS on the risk of dementia. The APOE ε4-related genetic risk was divided into high APOE ε4-related genetic risk (ε3/ε4, ε2/ε4, ε4/ε4) and low APOE ε4-related genetic risk (ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε3/ε3) based on the number of APOE ε4 alleles. The PRS were categorized into low (≤ quartile 1), intermediate (quartile 1 to quartile 3), and high (≥ quartile 3) based on the quartile distribution of the PRS in the entire sample. Reporting the corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) in the Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for age, gender, education, Townsend deprivation index, BMI, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, social isolation, healthy diet score, hearing problem, depression, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, cataract, and any other serious medical and family history of dementia
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Joint effects of the binary PhenoAgeAccel and APOE ε4-related genetic risk on dementia risk. A The risk of all-cause dementia onset. B The risk of young-onset dementia. C The risk of late-onset dementia. The APOE ε4-related genetic risk was divided into high APOE ε4-related genetic risk (ε3/ε4, ε2/ε4, ε4/ε4) and low APOE ε4-related genetic risk (ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε3/ε3) based on the number of APOE ε4 alleles. Reporting the corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) in the Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for age, gender, education, Townsend deprivation index, BMI, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, social isolation, healthy diet score, hearing problem, depression, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, cataract, and any other serious medical and family history of dementia
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Joint effects of the binary PhenoAgeAccel and the polygenetic risk score (PRS) on dementia risk. A The risk of all-cause dementia onset. B The risk of young-onset dementia. C The risk of late-onset dementia. The PRS were categorized into low (≤ quartile 1), intermediate (quartile 1 to quartile 3), and high (≥ quartile 3) based on the quartile distribution of the PRS in the entire sample. Reporting the corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) in the Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for age, gender, education, Townsend deprivation index, BMI, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, social isolation, healthy diet score, hearing problem, depression, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, cataract, and any other serious medical and family history of dementia

References

    1. Collaborators GBDDF. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(2):e105–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wimo A, Seeher K, Cataldi R, Cyhlarova E, Dielemann JL, Frisell O, et al. The worldwide costs of dementia in 2019. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(7):2865–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hendriks S, Ranson JM, Peetoom K, Lourida I, Tai XY, de Vugt M, et al. Risk factors for young-onset dementia in the UK Biobank. JAMA Neurol. 2024;81(2):134–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deckers K, van Boxtel MP, Schiepers OJ, de Vugt M, Munoz Sanchez JL, Anstey KJ, et al. Target risk factors for dementia prevention: a systematic review and Delphi consensus study on the evidence from observational studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;30(3):234–46. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources