Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):2823-2828.
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2823.

Establishment and evaluation of prediction model of recurrence after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy

Affiliations

Establishment and evaluation of prediction model of recurrence after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy

Ying-Jie Wu. World J Gastrointest Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Choledocholithiasis is a common clinical bile duct disease, laparoscopic choledocholithotomy is the main clinical treatment method for choledocholithiasis. However, the recurrence of postoperative stones is a big challenge for patients and doctors.

Aim: To explore the related risk factors of gallstone recurrence after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy, establish and evaluate a clinical prediction model.

Methods: A total of 254 patients who underwent laparoscopic choledocholithotomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University from December 2017 to December 2020 were selected as the research subjects. Clinical data of the patients were collected, and the recurrence of gallstones was recorded based on the postoperative follow-up. The results were analyzed and a clinical prediction model was established.

Results: Postoperative stone recurrence rate was 10.23% (26 patients). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that cholangitis, the diameter of the common bile duct, the diameter of the stone, number of stones, lithotripsy, preoperative total bilirubin, and T tube were risk factors associated with postoperative recurrence (P < 0.05). The clinical prediction model was ln (p/1-p) = -6.853 + 1.347 × cholangitis + 1.535 × choledochal diameter + 2.176 × stone diameter + 1.784 × stone number + 2.242 × lithotripsy + 0.021 × preoperative total bilirubin + 2.185 × T tube.

Conclusion: Cholangitis, the diameter of the common bile duct, the diameter of the stone, number of stones, lithotripsy, preoperative total bilirubin, and T tube are the associated risk factors for postoperative recurrence of gallstone. The prediction model in this study has a good prediction effect, which has a certain reference value for recurrence of gallstone after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy.

Keywords: Choledocholithiasis; Clinical prediction model; Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy; Recurrence; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: Authors declare no conflict of interests in publishing this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The receiver operating characteristic curves.

References

    1. Park SY, Hong TH, Lee SK, Park IY, Kim TH, Kim SG. Recurrence of common bile duct stones following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a multicenter study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019;26:578–582. - PubMed
    1. Liu J, Wei XJ, Yang ZL, Liao XY, Wu LH, Zheng YP, Zheng JH, Hu YQ, Zheng XL. Risk factors of common bile duct stones recurrence and nomogram for predicting recurrence after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a dual-center retrospective cohort study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27:2504–2513. - PubMed
    1. Wu Y, Xu CJ, Xu SF. Advances in Risk Factors for Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18:1067–1074. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toyoizumi H, Imazu H, Ikeda K, Mori N, Kanazawa K, Chiba M, Ang TL, Tajiri H. A novel second-generation multibending backward-oblique viewing duodenoscope in ERCP. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24:101–107. - PubMed
    1. Cai JS, Qiang S, Bao-Bing Y. Advances of recurrent risk factors and management of choledocholithiasis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:34–43. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources