Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist through a global consensus process
- PMID: 39352462
- PMCID: PMC12130094
- DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03760-y
Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist through a global consensus process
Abstract
Emergency departments (EDs) are at high risk for medical errors. Checklist implementation programs have been associated with improved patient outcomes in other high-risk clinical settings and when used to address specific aspects of ED care. The aim of this study was to develop an ED Safety Checklist with broad applicability across different international ED settings. A three-round modified Delphi consensus process was conducted with a multidisciplinary and multinational panel of experts in emergency medicine and patient safety. Initial checklist items were identified through a systematic review of the literature. Each item was evaluated for inclusion in the final checklist during two rounds of web-based surveys and an online consensus meeting. Agreement for inclusion was defined a priori with a threshold of 80% combined agreement. Eighty panel members from 34 countries across all seven world regions participated in the study, with comparable representation from low- and middle-income and high-income countries. The final checklist contains 86 items divided into: (1) a general ED Safety Checklist focused on diagnostic evaluation, patient reassessment, and disposition and (2) five domain-specific ED Safety Checklists focused on handoff, invasive procedures, triage, treatment prescription, and treatment administration. The checklist includes key clinical tasks to prevent medical errors, as well as items to improve communication among ED team members and with patients and their families. This novel ED Safety Checklist defines the essential elements of high-quality ED care and has the potential to ensure their consistent implementation worldwide.
Keywords: Checklist; Delphi technique; Emergency department; Medical errors; Patient safety; Quality of health care.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval, Human and animal rights: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was reviewed and approved as exempt by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB n°23–002537; study title “Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist to reduce medical errors”; approval date: April 10, 2023). Informed consent: Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from each panelist prior to the initiation of the Delphi consensus process.
Figures




References
-
- Amaniyan S, Faldaas BO, Logan PA, Vaismoradi M (2020) Learning from patient safety incidents in the emergency department: a systematic review. J Emerg Med 58(2):234–244 - PubMed
-
- Newman-Toker DE PS, Badihian S, Hassoon A, Nassery N, Parizadeh D, Wilson LM, Jia Y, Omron R, Tharmarajah S, Guerin L, Bastani PB, Fracica EA, Kotwal S, Robinson KA (2022) Diagnostic errors in the emergency department: a systematic review. Comparative effectiveness review no 258 (Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No 75Q80120D00003); AHRQ Publication No. 22(23)-EHC043 ( Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) - PubMed
-
- Klasco RS, Wolfe RE, Wong M, Edlow J, Chiu D, Anderson PD, Grossman SA (2015) Assessing the rates of error and adverse events in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 33(12):1786–1789 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical