Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;20(4):1203-1213.
doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03760-y. Epub 2024 Oct 1.

Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist through a global consensus process

Collaborators, Affiliations

Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist through a global consensus process

Lucrezia Rovati et al. Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) are at high risk for medical errors. Checklist implementation programs have been associated with improved patient outcomes in other high-risk clinical settings and when used to address specific aspects of ED care. The aim of this study was to develop an ED Safety Checklist with broad applicability across different international ED settings. A three-round modified Delphi consensus process was conducted with a multidisciplinary and multinational panel of experts in emergency medicine and patient safety. Initial checklist items were identified through a systematic review of the literature. Each item was evaluated for inclusion in the final checklist during two rounds of web-based surveys and an online consensus meeting. Agreement for inclusion was defined a priori with a threshold of 80% combined agreement. Eighty panel members from 34 countries across all seven world regions participated in the study, with comparable representation from low- and middle-income and high-income countries. The final checklist contains 86 items divided into: (1) a general ED Safety Checklist focused on diagnostic evaluation, patient reassessment, and disposition and (2) five domain-specific ED Safety Checklists focused on handoff, invasive procedures, triage, treatment prescription, and treatment administration. The checklist includes key clinical tasks to prevent medical errors, as well as items to improve communication among ED team members and with patients and their families. This novel ED Safety Checklist defines the essential elements of high-quality ED care and has the potential to ensure their consistent implementation worldwide.

Keywords: Checklist; Delphi technique; Emergency department; Medical errors; Patient safety; Quality of health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval, Human and animal rights: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was reviewed and approved as exempt by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB n°23–002537; study title “Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist to reduce medical errors”; approval date: April 10, 2023). Informed consent: Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from each panelist prior to the initiation of the Delphi consensus process.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consensus development process flowchart. Summary of the modified three-round Delphi process. Initial checklist items were identified by the core study team through a systematic review of the literature on medical errors in the emergency department
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
General Emergency Department Safety Checklist
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Domain-specific Emergency Department Safety Checklists
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient flow through the emergency department. Infographic describing the patient flow from arrival in the Emergency Department (ED) through discharge or admission to the hospital. The general ED Safety Checklist is designed for use at three critical junctures (indicated by the stop signal) where the clinician can pause to verify that all important tasks have been completed. The five domain-specific Safety Checklists complement the general checklist by aiding clinicians during other key moments in the ED care process (colored in red)

References

    1. Amaniyan S, Faldaas BO, Logan PA, Vaismoradi M (2020) Learning from patient safety incidents in the emergency department: a systematic review. J Emerg Med 58(2):234–244 - PubMed
    1. Stang AS, Wingert AS, Hartling L, Plint AC (2013) Adverse events related to emergency department care: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 8(9):e74214 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newman-Toker DE PS, Badihian S, Hassoon A, Nassery N, Parizadeh D, Wilson LM, Jia Y, Omron R, Tharmarajah S, Guerin L, Bastani PB, Fracica EA, Kotwal S, Robinson KA (2022) Diagnostic errors in the emergency department: a systematic review. Comparative effectiveness review no 258 (Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No 75Q80120D00003); AHRQ Publication No. 22(23)-EHC043 ( Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) - PubMed
    1. Klasco RS, Wolfe RE, Wong M, Edlow J, Chiu D, Anderson PD, Grossman SA (2015) Assessing the rates of error and adverse events in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 33(12):1786–1789 - PubMed
    1. Hansen K, Boyle A, Holroyd B, Phillips G, Benger J, Chartier LB, Lecky F, Vaillancourt S, Cameron P, Waligora G, Kurland L, Truesdale M (2020) Updated framework on quality and safety in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J 37(7):437–442 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources