Association between Left Ventricular Geometry, Systolic Ejection Time, and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Ambulatory Patients with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac function is important to quantify for risk stratification. Although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is commonly used, and identifies patients with poor systolic function, other easily acquired measures of cardiac function are needed, particularly to stratify patients with relatively preserved LVEF. LV relative wall thickness (RWT) has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with preserved LVEF, but the clinical relevance of this observation is not known. The purpose of this study was to assess whether increased RWT is a marker of subclinical cardiac dysfunction as measured by a surrogate of LV dysfunction and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) and if increased RWT is independently associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), an important clinical outcome and cardiovascular disease risk equivalent.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled ambulatory patients 18 years and older undergoing routine transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 2017 to January 2018. Patients with LVEF <50%, severe valvular disease, or liver failure were excluded. Multivariable regression evaluated the relationship between RWT, LVET, and CKD adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and vital signs.

Results: We analyzed data from 375 patients with mean age (±SD) 52.2 ± 15.3 years of whom 58% were female. Mean ± SD of RWT was 0.45 ± 0.10, while mean ± SD of LVET was 270 ms ± 33. In multivariable linear regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, and left ventricular mass, each 0.1 increase in RWT was associated with a decrease of 4.6 ms in LVET, indicating worse cardiac function (β, ± 95% CI) (-4.60, -7.37 to -1.48, p = 0.004). Of those with serum creatinine available 1 month before or after TTE, 20% (50/247) had stage 3 or greater CKD. In logistic regression (adjusted for sex, comorbidities, and medications), each 0.1 unit increase in RWT was associated with an 61% increased odds of CKD (aOR = 1.61, 1.03-2.53, p = 0.037). In multivariable ordinal regression adjusted for the same covariates, each 0.1 unit increase in RWT was associated with a 44% increased odds of higher CKD stage (aOR = 1.44, 1.03-2.02, p = 0.035). There was a trend but no statistically significant relationship between RWT and change in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year.

Conclusion: In an outpatient cohort undergoing TTE, increased RWT was independently associated with a surrogate of subclinical systolic dysfunction (LVET) and CKD. This suggests that RWT, an easily derived measure of LV geometry on TTE, may identify clinically relevant subclinical systolic dysfunction and patients with worse kidney function. Additional investigation to further clarify the relationships between RWT, systolic function, and kidney dysfunction over time and how this information may guide clinical intervention are warranted.

Keywords: Cardiac function; Cardiovascular risk factors; Echocardiography; Imaging.