Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 1;42(4):350-356.
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000001118. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

Is Intraoperative Muscle Motor Evoked Potential Variability due to Fluctuating Lower Motor Neuron Background Excitability?

Martín J Segura  1 , María E Talarico  1 , Lucas Piantoni  2 , Mariano A Noel  2 , David B MacDonald  3
Affiliations

Is Intraoperative Muscle Motor Evoked Potential Variability due to Fluctuating Lower Motor Neuron Background Excitability?

Martín J Segura et al. J Clin Neurophysiol. .

Abstract

Purpose: This pilot study tests the contribution of fluctuating lower motor neuron excitability to motor evoked potential (MEP) variability.

Methods: In six pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis and normal neurologic examination, cascades of 30 intraoperative H-reflexes (HRs) and MEPs were evoked in the soleus muscle using constant-current stimulators and recorded through surface electrodes with a 20-second interstimulus interval. First, HRs were obtained with an intensity capable of evoking the maximum response. Subsequently, MEPs were obtained with double trains and an intensity of 700 to 900 mA. Coefficients of variation (CVs) of amplitude and area under the curve from HRs and MEPs were compared using a paired two-tailed Student t test. Coefficients of correlation between the mean CVs of HR and MEP parameters were also assessed.

Results: Pooling the results from the six patients, the mean CV of amplitude from the MEP (24.6 ± 3) was significantly higher than that from the HR (3.5 ± 4.4) ( P = 0.000091). The mean CV of the MEP area under the curve (21.8 ± 4.8) was also statistically significantly higher than that from the HR area under the curve (3.4 ± 4.5) ( P = 0.00091). The coefficients of correlation of the mean CV of the HR amplitude and area under the curve compared with the corresponding values of the MEP were low ( r = 0.29) and very low ( r = 0.03), respectively.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that fluctuations in lower motor neuron excitability may be less important than previously thought to explain the magnitude of MEP variability. The efficacy of corticospinal volleys to recruit a larger and more stable lower motor neuron population would be critical to obtain reproducible MEPs.

Keywords: F-wave; H-reflex; IONM; LMN background facilitation; MEP variability; Multitrain TES.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Legatt AD, Emerson RG, Epstein CM, et al. ACNS guideline: transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 2016;33:42–50.
    1. Kobayashi S, Matsuyama Y, Shinomiya K, et al. A new alarm point of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: a prospective multicenter study from the Spinal Cord Monitoring Working Group of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;20:102–107.
    1. Langeloo DD, Lelivelt A, Louis Journée H, Slappendel R, de Kleuver M. Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity: a study of 145 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:1043–1050.
    1. Langeloo DD, Journée HL, de Kleuver M, Grotenhuis JA. Criteria for transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal deformity surgery. A review and discussion of the literature. Neurophysiol Clin 2007;37:431–439.
    1. Muramoto A, Imagama S, Ito Z, et al. The cutoff amplitude of transcranial motor-evoked potentials for predicting postoperative motor deficits in thoracic spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E21–E27.