Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May;17(5):558-564.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2860.

Accuracy of Different Dental Age Estimation Methods Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study

Affiliations

Accuracy of Different Dental Age Estimation Methods Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study

Ashima Tyagi et al. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 May.

Abstract

Background: Age assessment is useful in various fields of dentistry due to its ability to influence the planning of dental treatments. Dental age estimation methods are specifically based on age-related variables observed in two-dimensional (2D) radiographs in the dentition in terms of the time of emergence and are considered reliable in determining the chronological age; however, the inevitable problems of orientation errors found in 2D can be eliminated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Objective: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of different radiological dental age estimation methods using CBCT in relation to the chronological age of children.

Materials and methods: A total of 100 CBCT images of patients in the age-group of 8-15 years requiring orthodontic treatment were obtained from December 2019 to August 2022. The exact chronological age was determined through valid proof, that is, aadhar card or birth certificate. The dental age of the children was assessed using all four methods-Nolla's method (NM), Demirjian method (DM), Schour and Massler (S&M), and Cameriere method (CM).

Results: The results found that NM underestimated the mean age by 0.24 years, while DM overestimated the mean age by 0.82 years. Both showed statistically significant differences based on the standard deviation (SD) (p < 0.05). S&M and CM also overestimated the mean age by 1.16 years and 2.75 years respectively, but with statistically nonsignificant differences (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Among the four tested radiographic methods, the best accuracy was found with NM, which tended to underestimate but was closest to the chronological age. CBCT provided better age estimation values without image distortion.

How to cite this article: Tyagi A, Srivastava N, Rana V, et al. Accuracy of Different Dental Age Estimation Methods Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):558-564.

Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography; Demirjian method; Nolla's method; Schour and Massler.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: NoneConflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Stages of development given by Nolla
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2:
Demirjian's chart of tooth development
Fig. 3:
Fig. 3:
Schour and Massler's chart of tooth development
Fig. 4:
Fig. 4:
Comparison of different age estimation methods in relation to chronological age (in years)

References

    1. Bhadana S, Indushekar KR, Saraf BG, et al. Comparative assessment of chronological, dental, and skeletal age in children. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(5):687–691. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_698_17. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malik P, Rana V, Rehani U. To evaluate the relationship between mandibular canine calcification stages and skeletal age. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5(1):14–19. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1127. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. George GJ, Chatra L, Shenoy P, et al. Age determination by S&M method: a forensic study. Int J Forensic Odontol. 2018;3(1):36–39. doi: 10.4103/ijfo.ijfo_5_18. - DOI
    1. Schour I, Massler M. The development of the human dentition. J Am Den Assoc. 1941;28:1153–1160.
    1. Nolla CM. The development of permanent teeth. J Dent Child. 1960;27:254–266.

LinkOut - more resources